INSOMNIA STREAM： BEYONDISM EDITION.mp3

00:00:00 Me.
00:00:50 Yes.
00:00:52 Move.
00:00:55 Nothing we get.
00:01:08 I'm I'm I'm the right.
00:01:23 Please.
00:01:23 Others have frozen, can't break the ice no more.
00:01:30 Raining so hard now can't seem to find a shore.
00:01:49 This goes much deeper in this world.
00:02:09 Swimming.
00:02:21 No feelings, no time to sit around, no living.
00:02:30 Entry exit.
00:02:33 Like.
00:02:47 Small.
00:02:49 High.
00:02:54 It's come to.
00:02:56 Hello.
00:04:08 But.
00:04:34 Hey.
00:04:56 Knights in white satin never reaching the end.
00:05:05 Letters over it.
00:05:10 Never meaning to send.
00:05:15 Beauty with these eyes before.
00:05:24 Just what the?
00:05:28 I can.
00:05:32 Because I love you.
00:05:52 Gazing at people.
00:05:56 Some have been.
00:06:01 Just what I'm going.
00:06:06 They can understand.
00:06:11 Some try to tell me.
00:06:15 Folks, they cannot defend.
00:06:20 Just what you want to.
00:06:28 And.
00:06:28 Love you.
00:07:44 Knights and wipes.
00:07:48 Never.
00:08:03 Beauty. I've always been with this.
00:08:08 Before.
00:08:12 True, I can say anymore because I love you.
00:08:41 Because I love.
00:09:21 Welcome to the insomnia stream beyond Gism edition.
00:09:29 I'm your host, of course. Devon Stack. Hope you're having a good.
00:09:33 Weekend.
00:09:36 Good.
00:09:39 I don't know may.
00:09:41 May we we're already halfway through May. It's kind of crazy.
00:09:47 Kind of crazy. We're already halfway through. May it's heating up here in the desert.
00:09:52 Did some beekeeping today.
00:09:55 Bees are doing all right. They're still apparently enough.
00:09:59 Nectar and pollen around to where they are bringing more more in.
00:10:04 And a few hives swarm out because of my.
00:10:09 My failure to get to them in time, but whatever they were, they're they're they're feral hives anyway, so it doesn't really matter. I'm not losing any good genetics, if anything, all they could do is improve.
00:10:24 So but yeah, got got some honey, but extracting some honey.
00:10:30 Honey is very messy.
00:10:32 Very messy and very sticky.
00:10:35 And when it's mixed with wax, it just.
00:10:38 It just makes a mess. It's just a mess. It's a complete fucking mess.
00:10:43 And yeah, it's it's. I have a room now. That's just stick. The entire room is sticky.
00:10:53 And I'm sticky and it's everything sticky.
00:10:57 So yeah, but really good honey. Surprisingly different.
00:11:03 Different flavors of honey.
00:11:06 I've just been mixing them together. I'm not keeping them separate, but I've had a.
00:11:12 A few hives, like the way I've been taking, I've just taking frames. I'm not just taking, I'm not taking whole boxes. I'm letting the bees keep a lot of the honey for right now.
00:11:21 And surprised at how different in flavor and color a lot of the honeys are.
00:11:28 And.
00:11:30 That being said, I'm not keeping them separate. I'm kind of just mixing together and just having.
00:11:34 Honey, generally, but it's all unfiltered, unfiltered and raw honey.
00:11:42 That I will be storing away. I've got too much of it now. I've probably got just from today.
00:11:51 Roughly about 5 gallons I extracted probably today.
00:11:55 So that's that was fun. You know, I got a whole bunch of probably have more, probably at least another gallon that's mixed in with wax cappings and stuff. So that's one part of the process I haven't quite.
00:12:11 Figured out an efficient way of dealing with the.
00:12:18 The mixed I mean I can press it through cheesecloth. I've got ways of dealing with it, but I'm I'm trying to figure out like a nice.
00:12:25 Easy way of separating wax from the honey that's leftover from the decapping everything and.
00:12:33 And once I've got that figured out, the whole process will be.
00:12:38 I'll have a fairly good understanding of and then kind of a.
00:12:43 A well process, I guess that I can go about in the future. So still experimenting and hopefully by the end.
00:12:50 Of the summer.
00:12:52 When I extract some more, which won't be a whole lot more because, well, most in most places in the in.
00:12:58 The country you.
00:13:00 You harvest in the fall.
00:13:02 All.
00:13:03 After the summer, it's not really a good idea in the desert unless you get a second spring, which sometimes happens. It depends on how much it rains, because if you harvest more at the end of the summer, you're just going to lessen their ability to survive the winter because of the availability of new pollen and nectar.
00:13:05 I didn't.
00:13:24 Sources.
00:13:25 But you know.
00:13:26 So this is probably it for this year in terms of harvest.
00:13:31 Anyway.
00:13:33 Tonight I thought we would talk about beyond gism.
00:13:37 Beyond is and and I think the reason why I was I came across this while researching something else, but it it piqued my interest a little bit simply because.
00:13:50 I think right now we have a lot of criticism.
00:13:55 Of of Christianity.
00:13:58 And the way that it is.
00:14:01 How it I guess relates to white nationalism or even just white genocide, or even just Western society generally.
00:14:11 And people are quick to point out the the exploits and the weaknesses.
00:14:18 And there's a lot of discussion about this and it's and it's it's discussion that has to be had, but there is a severe lack.
00:14:29 In my opinion of any.
00:14:33 Solutions or even alternatives that are that are even somewhat viable.
00:14:40 Usually.
00:14:42 When there are, there are alternatives offered it. It comes in the form of like, say, Paganism, and I've often pointed out that.
00:14:53 Some of the big problems with that is, hey, no one actually believes in Thor.
00:14:59 You know they don't. No. Let. Let's be honest, even if you're a a practicing Pagan. And I'm sure there's at least one or two of you guys out there listening.
00:15:08 Do you really actually believe it? You know, or is it more of, like, a respect for your, your traditions and and and maybe, you know, there's some way?
00:15:19 Of of.
00:15:21 Sigh, hopping yourself into believing it a little bit, but no one actually I.
00:15:25 Mean, come on.
00:15:26 No one actually believes in in Norse gods, right? Like no one actually does. And or.
00:15:35 At least a.
00:15:36 Very tiny minority does, and there's not wide appeal for new people to start believing in something like that.
00:15:43 And the other the other problem with it really.
00:15:46 Is that it's it's a step backwards in a way. You can say. It's sure. I think that the natural inclination for white people, especially those who are facing the existential crisis that we are, is to look back at the past and want to preserve parts of our culture and our heritage.
00:16:06 That we find valuable, but at the same time, we can't always be looking backwards and and I think there's a tendency.
00:16:16 Of White people right now in our current situation and it, you know obviously one obvious example that's not quite as you know let's go back to the fucking you know, pre pre Christendom days but rather let's go back to the 90s or let's go back to the 1950s or or but it's always going back it's never looking forward.
00:16:38 And that which which is a problem in and of itself, because inevitably, no matter how far back you go, you are just going back to a an era that will inevitably lead to where we are today, you know. And I guess you could say, well, if you rewind the tape long enough.
00:16:57 It'll it'll be.
00:16:58 A really long time before you get to today and it's like, well, OK, but you know, you're still going to get there.
00:17:04 And so it doesn't really address anything in terms of of of, you know moving forward and progressing. I think that's another problem too. I think that the just the word progressive.
00:17:18 Has really kind of solely.
00:17:21 And and made dirty the concept of progressing as as a race and as a as a people because it's that term has been hijacked by Communist Jews to mean something horrific and to mean something that's.
00:17:38 That's really interchangeable with and to just to some degree with white genocide and so.
00:17:45 People tend to, almost in a way, embrace.
00:17:53 The I guess the opposite of of evolution, you know, like devolution, like going, going back to basics is one thing, but almost I mean to like as we see with say, like flat Earthers, you know, like a rejection of science, a rejection of of modernity that that mutates into.
00:18:13 An embrace of, like, a Luddite worldview.
00:18:17 And and so that's that's kind of a problem too.
00:18:24 Anyway, the in looking at.
00:18:29 You know, solutions that have been offered in the past by intelligent white people, I came across Beyondism and this is not an endorsement of Beyondism at all like at all. But it's more just a an exploration of one man's ideas as to what could possibly.
00:18:51 Be a a viable theology for people interested in the evolution of their race in a way that is anti globalist in a way that is.
00:19:10 Not always, but in many ways embraces many of the tenants that many of us hold dear. And.
00:19:17 And kind of take a look at it just academically and and see what what might could or what could be learned from this, what, what his criticisms really are of of.
00:19:32 Christianity and Abrahamic religions generally.
00:19:37 What his proposed solutions were because at least he had.
00:19:41 At a proposed solution.
00:19:44 And and what what, if anything, you could take from this and implement whether as a replacement or replacement for or in tandem with your current theology. I don't know. I just think it's it would be, it's an interesting look at.
00:20:04 A philosophy that I don't, by the way, I don't think would and we'll go into why I don't think would ever have the ability to take off. There's there's a, there's a, it's, it's a sad reason, but it's a very, I think, a definitive reason why it would never, never, ever.
00:20:23 There you go. But without further ado, let's just go to the background of of the man who came up with Beyondism before we even talk about what it is that that's the man on the screen here. This is Raymond B Kent Kato.
00:20:39 Well.
00:20:40 He is well known in the the field of psychology in the field of intelligence testing.
00:20:50 And.
00:20:52 Here, here I guess. Here's like a a little bit of a bio on him. He was born on March 20th in Hilltop, England in 1898.
00:21:02 He earned a degree in chemistry from Kings College London at age 19.
00:21:11 In 1921.
00:21:13 By 1924, he completed a PhD in psychology at the University.
00:21:20 The College London under Charles Spearman focusing on intelligence and factor analysis.
00:21:27 In the 1920s through the 1930s, he developed an interest in personality psychology and worked as a lecturer and researcher in England in 1937. So just prior to World War Two, he moved to the United States. And this is.
00:21:46 Yeah.
00:21:47 This is something that a context that's often lost.
00:21:52 Eugenicists were fairly mainstream prior to World War 2, and he's a eugenicist.
00:22:00 And a lot of his his work was was in that that context. In fact, America was really the the pioneering, the pioneering.
00:22:14 I guess academic playground for you Genesis prior.
00:22:17 To World War 2.
00:22:19 And it wasn't until World War 2 and the narrative of evil Hitler and you know all that, you know, the Holocaust and everything goes along with that, that eugenics got a bad name. In fact, prior to.
00:22:34 World War 2 several states had eugenicists laws, forced sterilization laws and had programs in one way or another to alter the genetic makeup of their people in ways that they thought were.
00:22:49 Genic and those laws were challenged and brought before the Supreme Court to give an idea of how much things have changed.
00:22:57 And they were upheld by the Supreme Court.
00:23:00 Including for sterilization laws that that, that I about half the states had.
00:23:07 Some states.
00:23:10 I think technically still have 4 sterilization laws on the books, they're just not enforced because after World War 2 the whole narrative changed that, you know, eugenics was bad. It was evil, it it was synonymous with genocide and the Holocaust and all this stuff.
00:23:28 But before that had happened, he moved here in 1937 and and I think taught at Columbia University and. And that's not our window and how much things have changed. Columbia University inviting you genesis.
00:23:46 To come teach prior to World War 2, whereas now Columbia University is basically a hotbed of anti white ISM and and communism.
00:23:57 In 1938, he published his one of his earliest works in personality trait.
00:24:04 And started laying down the groundwork for his personality trait theory, which we'll get into in a.
00:24:10 Moment.
00:24:12 In 1941, he joined Harvard, and he refined some of his methods for studying and testing for personality.
00:24:23 1945 he was appointed research professor at the University of Illinois, where he spent the bulk of his career.
00:24:34 Year in 1946 he published a description and measurement of personality, introducing his 16 personality factor or the 16 PF model, which we'll get into in a.
00:24:46 Moment.
00:24:47 Which became.
00:24:50 Pretty much the gold standard for personality assessment.
00:24:55 In the 1950s and 60s.
00:24:58 He experimented his research on intelligence.
00:25:01 And sought to distinguish between fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence, and, you know, differentiating between intelligence that was innate versus intelligence that could be learned and influencing cognitive psychology.
00:25:22 With his theories in the 1960s he developed the Kittel or with with John Horn. He developed the Cattell Horn theory of intelligence.
00:25:32 Integrating the fluid and crystallized intelligence concepts.
00:25:37 In the 1970s, he published extensively on personality, motivation and group dynamics and authored over 50 books and 500 articles. In 1978, he retired from the University of Illinois, but continued his research and writing.
00:25:56 And in the 1980s, he formulated what we're going to be talking about tonight, and that is Beyondism, which is described as a controversial ethical philosophy proposing that human evolution should be guided by scientific principles.
00:26:16 And group selection detailed in works like a new morality from science science.
00:26:24 Beyondism and another work Beyondism, religion from science.
00:26:30 He suggested that society should be should prioritize genetic and cultural progress.
00:26:36 And because of its eugenics like implications.
00:26:40 Of course it was.
00:26:43 Criticized tremendously by Jewish academics.
00:26:48 In 1997, he he was going to receive the American Psychological Foundations Gold Medal Award for lifetime achievement.
00:26:59 But it was protested because of his connections to eugenics.
00:27:04 And in 1998, at age 99, he in fact, like a month from being 100 years old.
00:27:10 He died on February 2nd in Honolulu. HI.
00:27:16 So lived almost a century.
00:27:19 And contributed significantly to the field of personality testing.
00:27:25 And psychology.
00:27:28 And with a focus on on in the later years his.
00:27:35 Beyondism, I guess you could call it.
00:27:38 A theology.
00:27:39 That was that was science based.
00:27:43 Now this is this is kind of an example of his 16 PF.
00:27:49 Model, or at least the the results of the 16 PF model personality test.
00:27:59 This is probably his most famous contribution, more so than the beyond Beyondism.
00:28:06 And they still use this or variations of this today.
00:28:10 To help with.
00:28:14 Career counseling and just.
00:28:18 Or even just psychological counseling and that sort of a.
00:28:21 Thing.
00:28:23 It's a more complex version of a lot of what we use today, which usually like you know, people for the Myers Briggs or what is it called like the five Factor personality test or something like that, but this is.
00:28:37 Just a more granular version of that and those were largely based on his work.
00:28:44 The 16 different points here you can see.
00:28:49 They they it's like a sliding scale.
00:28:53 Between the first one.
00:28:56 You know how reserved versus how outgoing you are, so this would be kind of like the introvert extrovert thing.
00:29:04 The second one being concrete thinking versus abstract thinking.
00:29:08 So.
00:29:11 You thinking outside the box versus, you know, Rain Man, autism.
00:29:18 Affected by feelings versus emotionally stable. So basically, how easily your mind can be hijacked by emotions.
00:29:31 The fourth being how submissive versus dominant you are in the way that you conduct yourself.
00:29:38 So I guess.
00:29:40 You know, MPC would be the fully submissive.
00:29:45 And radicals would be fully dominant.
00:29:49 How serious versus happy go lucky you are. That's the way it's described here. Obviously that's.
00:29:58 You know that that doesn't really require explanation, how expedient versus conscientious you are.
00:30:06 How shy versus bold you are, which is different than reserved and outgoing.
00:30:13 How tough minded versus sensitive.
00:30:16 How trusting versus suspicious?
00:30:21 How practical versus imaginative and a lot of these might seem like they're redundant, but this is.
00:30:27 Why? I guess more modern tests have kind of consolidated these into the same category, whereas he actually spent a lot of his research prior to making this test.
00:30:43 On trying to be as granular as possible by by going through and evaluating dictionaries, you know to to try to come up with the most precise.
00:30:58 Words possible to have the most granular descriptions of personality and making these different you know these subtle but important differences in in these terms, how forthright versus shrewd.
00:31:14 How self assured versus apprehensive.
00:31:19 How conservative versus experimenting, how group dependent versus self-sufficient?
00:31:26 How undisciplined versus self controlled and how relaxed versus tense?
00:31:34 And one of he was also one of the first people researchers to instead of looking at these personality tests.
00:31:44 As a tool to deal with individuals.
00:31:49 Rather to.
00:31:51 Apply these to groups of people so people that maybe have similar occupations.
00:31:59 And try to find where these groups had similarities. You know intragroup.
00:32:08 And intergroup, and where they would have departures. And in fact the the example image here as you can see that I found to illustrate the test.
00:32:21 It's airline pilots versus creative artists versus writers, and so some of the departures you see between the creative types and airline pilots would be the most obvious is tough minded versus sensitive.
00:32:38 Which would make sense if you have an airline pilot, you know someone that is having to make you know very precise decisions based on on real world data.
00:32:53 That is free from emotion. That's the kind of departure you'd want to see.
00:32:59 In a airline pilot versus a creative type, another one is practical versus imaginative. Same exact reason you know you you wouldn't want. You don't want very imaginative airline pilots, self assured versus apprehensive. The same thing.
00:33:18 And you can see that airline pilots also excel in self-control.
00:33:23 And they're very relaxed because you again, you don't want.
00:33:28 A airline pilot. Who's?
00:33:31 High stress, tense and and and and you know unable to be relaxed to make high pressure decisions that could affect the lives of.
00:33:41 Hundreds of people on board of an airline.
00:33:45 So this this again, this is his. This was one of his big contributions.
00:33:50 To the field of psychology.
00:33:55 Now let's take a look at.
00:34:02 At Beyondism.
00:34:06 The.
00:34:08 Beyondism.
00:34:09 One of the the the major.
00:34:14 Major differences.
00:34:16 In fact, this is where there's probably a big conflict between at least a lot of Christians. Not, and I don't even know if it's the majority these days, but at least a lot of Christians versus.
00:34:26 A practicing beyond just I guess you could.
00:34:29 Say.
00:34:30 Is that the beyond list would would say that a lot of Beyondism is based on the acceptance.
00:34:39 That evolution.
00:34:41 Is the driving force.
00:34:44 Of human well, not just human existence, but life.
00:34:49 That evolution is the driving force behind life.
00:34:53 And that because.
00:34:55 That is the driving force behind life that we should seek to create a philosophy or a theology that accepts this.
00:35:07 And that is in harmony with this and.
00:35:12 Rather than a theology or philosophy that rejects it.
00:35:18 And that one of the benefits to this would be.
00:35:26 For example.
00:35:28 If you believe in evolution, you start to believe in large or long time scales, right? And I think one of the shortcomings of people who reject.
00:35:40 Evolution and the people that you know, like I'd say, extreme fundamentalist Christians who literally believe the earth is only 4000 years old and and that we were, you know, made out of clay or, you know, whatever it is right like that, that, that there was no.
00:35:58 Pre human beings and that dinosaurs are fake and you know all.
00:36:04 This other stuff.
00:36:05 The one of the the the shortcomings of that and one of the the problems that it creates is you start thinking in shorter timelines.
00:36:14 That and that, that doesn't just project itself into the past. It's not just that if if you think the world is 4000 years old, that it makes you unable to conceptualize things that you know, like like evolution that takes millions of years. But it also inhibits your ability to project.
00:36:35 Decision making and how it affects the future.
00:36:38 And so a beyond hist would say that one of the reasons why you would want to build your theology or your philosophy.
00:36:53 Around evolution is that the decisions that you would make now, you would have the understanding that it would have effects that would go on for generations and and not just, you know, one or two generations, but potentially or even hopefully millions of of generation.
00:37:13 And that you would want to make decisions that would have positive effects.
00:37:21 Projected into the future for.
00:37:24 Infinite generations without this understanding or this belief that.
00:37:32 Well, the world's timeline isn't all that long, and in fact, as many of the same people that would reject evolution under these grounds would also be.
00:37:41 That not only was the beginning of history only 4000 years ago, but the end of history is just around the corner. You know, a lot of these same people that would reject evolution and believe that the world's 4000 years old would also believe that the end of the world is nigh. I mean, not like, maybe necessarily like a.
00:38:02 A death cult or something, you know, like a Armageddon death cult.
00:38:05 But I think it's fairly common. I would even say of Christians that believe in evolution. It's a common belief that you know the the the return of Jesus, for example, is is maybe not eminent or, but it's also not going to.
00:38:26 It's not like 4000 years in the future, it's it's.
00:38:30 You know, in, in terms of looking at the world as only 4000 years old, it's it's actually is eminent you know it's it's not too much further down the road. I I grew up in an environment like that you know in in fact the long version of the.
00:38:43 Or the official version of the Mormon religion is the Church of Jesus Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints because the Latter Day Saints, part meaning the understanding of of.
00:38:55 You know the the Mormon worldview is that.
00:38:58 We are now basically in the last phase.
00:39:02 Of God's plan for earth that you know that we we have the last 4000 years. You know the Adam and Eve story and that we've gone through these different phases, these different evolutions. I mean no pun intended of of human society. And we're now in the last phase prior to the return of the Messiah.
00:39:22 Yeah, and. And so that is really what Mormonism is designed to prepare people for is the return of Jesus. And this final phase of humanity. And while that's that's probably foreign to some degree to most.
00:39:39 Christians, I I feel like there is some version of that.
00:39:43 That is accepted by by maybe not even just Christians, but by Muslims as well.
00:39:50 And in Jews, you know, like they Jews see the world as, you know, not the return of Jesus as eminent, but in many Jews see the the first appearance of the moshiach is eminent, you know, with with Muslims it's, you know, the the 9th imam or whatever the hell you know their their thing is.
00:40:09 But there is this expectation that that you're waiting for like the the arrival of a A.
00:40:19 Supernatural being that's going to change everything forever.
00:40:24 And you can even say even a lot of new age religions kind of viewed the the universe in this way. You know, prior to especially.
00:40:33 The year 2000, there was a lot of this focus on, you know, the end of the Mayan calendar is 2012 and and you know it's going to be this new age that's going to be ushered in by who knows what.
00:40:44 But.
00:40:46 That seems to be a part of the human condition in a lot of ways to to view.
00:40:52 The era that you live in as as being sort of like the the preamble to something big that's about to happen, because there does seem to be some kind of, you know, consistency across many religions that that at least.
00:41:12 Gives, gives.
00:41:14 At least creates the the possibility of this of this interpretation of of your existence.
00:41:21 And so beyond, just would say, well, this this sort of thing would be would no longer exist because you would view the universe as having a an infinite timeline really in either direction of your life.
00:41:38 And that all of your decisions and your all of your ethics would be based on this idea that you are really just in a random spot in an infinite timeline. There is no great event, you know.
00:41:58 To the degree that there ever is one that's just around the corner, you know there is no expectation that you're you're preparing for something that is eminent and and everything that you do.
00:42:12 Should be done in.
00:42:15 In keeping with this idea that you are on this.
00:42:19 Infinite timeline it also a beyond this which there are. There's no real. Let's get that away too. There's not like there's.
00:42:28 Not like practicing beyond this or.
00:42:31 Or anything like that. There's. I mean, there's not like that. There used to be, I think a beyond a society or something like that, but that, you know.
00:42:39 Nothing like that exists.
00:42:42 This again, this is just strictly academic. We're just looking at it, but they if they were to exist.
00:42:51 They would also say that because of this infinite timeline and because of evolution a being a, a, just a reality of this, that, that, that, that that's a far more.
00:43:10 More beneficial thing to base your ethics around rather than something that is taken on faith and just divined as and and just, you know, accepted rather than.
00:43:27 Having having having to be put through any kind of scientific wringer.
00:43:33 Another aspect of of Beyondism.
00:43:38 Is this?
00:43:40 Idea that human progress.
00:43:43 Depends on natural selection, not just between individuals.
00:43:49 But between entire groups and in fact, this is really kind of a big concept when it comes to Beyondism.
00:43:58 And that the the competition between individuals.
00:44:04 While that guides natural selection.
00:44:08 Not just biologically, but culturally.
00:44:12 You also have to have these different groups competing with each other in order to foster an environment that's going to accelerate and optimize natural selection. So this is where you kind of get the anti globalist.
00:44:32 Sentiments of Beyondism, because it views globalism or multiculturalism as kind of a dysgenic force.
00:44:44 Yes.
00:44:44 On humanity because it is.
00:44:49 It's it's effectively hobbling.
00:44:53 One of the the major drives of natural selection, or drivers of natural selection and evolution. By instead of having separate groups of people competing against each other, just having one giant group.
00:45:12 Now you get. There's a lot of people, I guess, to put this in a way that a lot of Americans at least would understand this, especially those who don't believe in big government for the same reason. It's the difference between wanting a strong federal government that makes broad.
00:45:32 Far reaching edicts that the entire continent essentially has to obey, and versus having 50 different states that all have their own individual.
00:45:47 You could say experiments running simultaneously.
00:45:51 And I think a lot of Americans who would relate to this.
00:45:57 This difference of of philosophies and and would embrace the idea that there should be 50 different experiments going on. Usually the idea is well if you have 50 different states who are free to exercise their autonomy.
00:46:17 And and and and to perform their own experiments separate from each other and from the federal government.
00:46:27 You will have an environment where progress will be increased because you'll have. You'll have more test tubes in the laboratory to be looking at.
00:46:44 And so when a.
00:46:44 State.
00:46:45 Creates a new law or a new culture that becomes more effective and accelerates progress in that state. Then the other states could look at that state and be like, well, what? Why are they doing so well?
00:47:00 What can we maybe borrow from what they're doing and apply it to us as it would relate to us? And it would. It wouldn't be exactly the same, because every state is different, and that's part of maintaining this experiment as as having 50 different test tubes as opposed to 1. You would never want to adopt whole cloth.
00:47:21 The all the ideas of of the most successful state, because then you.
00:47:25 Would.
00:47:26 Just you know, you go back to the original problem of having just one experiment going on.
00:47:31 But you would have different states looking at each other at all times, and and in cooperation, which with each other.
00:47:40 Under the umbrella of the federal government, and they would be distinct people, you'd have, you know, each state would not only be different in terms of their laws, but you would have a.
00:47:56 Distinct.
00:47:58 Biological difference, even between the states. You know you would have in a perfect world, especially through the lens of a beyond list, you would have ethnic differences between Californians and New Yorkers. You would have, you know, the genetic differences between people in Nevada.
00:48:18 And people in Louisiana, you would have cultural differences between two different states. You might even have to some degree. And we used to have differences in language and dialect.
00:48:30 Than everything else.
00:48:32 And that maintaining these differences.
00:48:36 From a beyond this point of view is actually crucial for the overall survival of humanity, and obviously this would extend to creating different or or or maintaining different races.
00:48:53 And different nations. So beyond this would want to, for example, oppose multiracialism and and and promote, maybe not, maybe not completely isolationist, but largely isolationist views of the world where you.
00:49:12 Would have different races of people competing against each other, and so that's that's another major.
00:49:22 I guess foundational principle of Beyondism is that in order for natural selection and evolution to take place, you have to maintain.
00:49:35 Groups and that by eroding the existence of different groups and by mixing the test tubes together. And you, you're actually retarding evolution, you are retarding the progress of mankind by limiting the experiment.
00:49:55 Just one test tube, and in fact putting I guess you could say evolutionarily, putting all your eggs in one basket, you're actually increasing the likelihood of total.
00:50:07 Collapse total extinction by by putting all of your eggs into one globalist basket and and opening yourself up to the possibility that a a global mistake is made that leads to.
00:50:24 The extinction, they would also say that.
00:50:32 Not only does.
00:50:34 Is it better to have these different test tubes going on simultaneously? Because you have these different experiments going on, but it also contributes to a a sense of competition.
00:50:52 Right. And that's that's pretty easy to view if you look at what the Olympics for example, were supposed to be.
00:50:59 You have this rivalry between the different nations between the different ethnicities, and this is basically material.
00:51:09 Prizes at the Olympics? Well, it used to before again, the test tube started getting mixed up. You you have this, this comradery, you know, this, this, this coordination between the different countries. You know, they come together and they compete in a in a healthy you know.
00:51:29 Nice way. You know, it's not like a. It's not like a war. You know, the the, the, the losing team doesn't get killed or anything like that. You know, it's a very peaceful way of competing in a way that it that that it I guess recognizes that.
00:51:46 You know the existence of of mankind is as as a as a group, but with several subgroups that are are are they can be defined and do have their differences and can compete with each other.
00:52:03 And so having these different groups. Not only does it it it limit the possibility of of stagnation when it comes to evolution, but it also promotes healthy progress within different groups because they are. They do see each other as competitors.
00:52:24 And it does.
00:52:27 Increase the likelihood that they will progress.
00:52:32 So.
00:52:36 You know that I think that that, that that's pretty much that covers that aspect of it.
00:52:43 Another.
00:52:44 Key concept when it comes to Beyondism.
00:52:48 Is that?
00:52:51 This is this. This might sound a little bit like it's well this this is kind of a little repetitive. It is that in order for evolution to work, you need to maintain actual diversity and that if you actually care about, you know, human diversity, that the last thing you would want to do.
00:53:11 Would be to mix people together.
00:53:14 Because that would be the death of diversity that if you were to get everyone, let's just say, you know, let's just, you know, use use two different countries. As an example, let's just say you have.
00:53:30 Spain and Uzbekistan, and let's say for some reason you decide to to mix the two together. Well, now you you'll only have one people eventually. I mean you you'd have.
00:53:43 A lot of nonsense, you know, like at first, but like or like, I guess you could look at.
00:53:48 Mexico, right?
00:53:50 Gems exist because you maxed Spaniards with Aztecs basically, and you create this hybrid race.
00:54:01 And so you you want to keep these people separate so that you maintain genetic diversity and which?
00:54:10 Again.
00:54:11 Helps with the evolution of not just the individual countries themselves, but all countries benefit from having this genetic diversity.
00:54:23 So that's again that kind of goes into the thing we're talking previously.
00:54:29 Another foundational.
00:54:31 Aspect of Beyondism is the understanding that.
00:54:38 A group's success.
00:54:40 Would depend on the rules.
00:54:44 That it that that it defines and that it lives by.
00:54:49 And how its members would treat each other, meaning the people within their own group.
00:54:57 And that what would be considered ethical?
00:55:00 For any particular group.
00:55:03 Would at the at the end all be all? What would define what is ethical within that group would be. Does it help the group survive and thrive?
00:55:16 And that would define literally every ethical question.
00:55:21 And that this would also because it does focus on that specific.
00:55:28 It it it it departs from.
00:55:32 Most of the the modern day religions in that there is no universalism. It is specific to that group and what might be considered ethical within say.
00:55:45 The Congo.
00:55:47 And be legitimately ethical for the Congolese?
00:55:51 Wouldn't be considered ethical to people who live in England and the English people?
00:55:57 Because their their priorities are going to be different, because the priority of the English people is going to be the survive, the survival and the thriving of the English people.
00:56:10 In every ethical quandary will be that that will be the test that is applied to it, and that is how they will determine what is ethical. Is does this benefit the English people? And so clearly you're going to have differences because the the.
00:56:30 The survival and the thriving of the English people in some ways, in some instances will be in direct conflict with with other groups and what is going to.
00:56:43 Ultimately, promote their survival and their thriving, and so this is another aspect of Beyondism that is.
00:56:51 Very different from most most popular religions is that it is not universal at all. It maintains that every group's ethics are independent of every other group's ethics, and that this is actually a positive thing to have these these relative.
00:57:11 Ethics and that all ethics? I guess that's a.
00:57:15 Good way of.
00:57:15 Putting it all ethics are relative to the group practicing those ethics.
00:57:22 And that this would increase the success of these groups and look, you could say this is one of the things you hear.
00:57:29 A lot of.
00:57:30 People point out about Jews and that one of the reasons why they seem to be successful when they go to other countries.
00:57:41 Is their ethics continues to center around what is good for Jews? It never it. Never.
00:57:51 Changes to what is good, like if a Jew moves to Spain.
00:57:55 The Jew still thinks about what is good for Jews and not what is good for Spain.
00:58:01 If a a Jew lives in America, their decisions are what is good. You know, based on what is good for Jews, not what is good for America. And this is a major point of contention for people who are, I guess.
00:58:19 And who who, who are in in opposition to Jewish power, is that Jews do practice.
00:58:26 This ethnic ethnocentric ethical.
00:58:34 Implementation and so Beyondism would say.
00:58:39 Every group should behave this way. Every group should consider ethics to be relative to their group and that.
00:58:49 Paradoxically, as much as it might seem like this wouldn't benefit humanity as a whole that it actually would, because by every group focusing on what's ethical for them and what is going to help them survive as a people, it maintains these other foundational principles of beyond.
00:59:09 Meaning that it is maintaining this diversity that, Beyondism, sees as necessary, it's maintaining the.
00:59:18 Promotion of of the survival of the fittest. It's maintaining a it's focusing evolution and natural selection for each individual group. It's focusing that energy and and taking taking the power away from more.
00:59:39 Altruistic.
00:59:42 Philosophies or actions that would.
00:59:47 Retard natural selection for individual groups that if every group was interested in the the evolutionary success of that group, that would streamline natural selection and evolution for each individual group.
01:00:03 So. So that's a that's a that's a major difference you could say.
01:00:09 Between.
01:00:12 Beyondism and and literally any universalist religion, that right and wrong would be, would, would, maybe even you.
01:00:20 Know.
01:00:21 Something as simple as right and wrong would be different depending on what group you're talking about.
01:00:29 And that the I guess the other side of that is.
01:00:34 The ethics.
01:00:36 Are every every ethical question is is determined by what is best for that group, so it also gives it a scientific.
01:00:47 Process in which those ethics can be determined, meaning that because you have, it's no longer.
01:00:57 A mysterious or faith-based decision making process.
01:01:02 What your what? Your ethics should be? It's no longer a supernatural.
01:01:08 Determination what is right and wrong it is.
01:01:12 Easy to determine what would what right and wrong would be if you know that right and wrong has to be whatever is good for the race. Now again, there might be some trial and error. You might think that, well, this is what's gonna, you know, as a race or as a group you might determine that doing XY and Z is what's going to be best for your race and then you end up being wrong.
01:01:34 Right.
01:01:34 And so you end up having ethics that are actually bad for your people, thinking that it was going to be good for your people. Well, that's again, that's part of natural selection groups that are that are making bad decisions like this.
01:01:48 Groups that are making decisions that are actually contrary or or in I guess, in conflict with with what's best for their their evolutionary future, they would be judged harshly by evolution and natural selection, and they would be selected out because they were making these bad decisions.
01:02:10 So.
01:02:11 Even though that you know, it might seem like it's, it's still a little arbitrary. It's not because if a group does make these decisions that that are bad, that they'll be punished for it by not, you know, by by failing.
01:02:30 Another principle I guess you could say of of Beyondism.
01:02:35 Is that or? I guess a world, I guess a.
01:02:39 Not really a principle so much as it's a worldview or a view of other religions.
01:02:44 That Beyondism has is that traditional religions did emerge.
01:02:52 Out of evolutionary need and that it is, you know, in a way you could describe it as a a technology.
01:03:01 And Beyondism, of course, because it's a competing technology, views other religions as inadequate and outdated technology.
01:03:12 They view other religions, you know, traditional Christianity, Islam and whatnot. As technology that grew out of the need to set set forth values and ethics.
01:03:30 That would be good for the survival of the group and so that essentially these religions were trying to accomplish.
01:03:39 That the same thing that Beyondism is trying to accomplish.
01:03:43 And that is to to create ethics and behaviors and rules that would promote the survival of the group, but that all of these religions made a fatal mistake.
01:03:55 And that that is they tried to apply their rules to everyone.
01:04:01 Ignoring the fact that different.
01:04:03 Whoops, have different capabilities.
01:04:07 Different needs, different destinies, different desires, and so by trying to universalize their rules, their theology, their philosophy to be 1 size fits all, they do so at the detriment to different groups and in different.
01:04:28 So one example would be.
01:04:32 You often hear a lot of leftists complain about Christian missionaries that you know the colonists would would go and colonize a third world country and immediately attempt to try to convert the the locals to Christianity. And you know, they complain.
01:04:52 Ohh, this destroyed our our.
01:04:55 Our heritage and Christians would say, well, you know all we were doing was we were like, let's take India as an example, right? The in India they had the practice of I forget what it's called. But where if if a man dies then his wife throws himself onto the, you know, when they burn the body of the.
01:05:14 Of the guy that the wife throws herself onto the fire and the the English, the columnist said. You know, they put a stop to that practice because they saw it as barbaric.
01:05:25 And so to an English person, it would be barbaric to do that and.
01:05:31 That the argument there from the the the Christian Englishmen would be that you know, we we stopped a great evil. You know they they were these backwards people. They were needlessly sacrificing the wives of these these men you know the the with these widows.
01:05:48 But.
01:05:50 It's ignoring the the context of. Had you left this society alone as a separate society? That was part of their their evolutionary path, that it was one way of like you can disagree with it. But Beyondism says, it doesn't matter. You know their ethics are relative to their.
01:06:10 To them, as a people, their ethics dictated that, well, we don't know what to do with these. It was solving a problem. We have these.
01:06:18 Is widows that our society is not equipped to provide for, and so when their husband dies, the man that's providing for them dies. We got to throw him in the fire, you know, and to English. So society that is equipped and has mechanisms to.
01:06:39 Deal with these widows when these these instances happen where their provider dies, it seems barbaric and out of touch, but unfortunately they've they've disrupted and upended the evolution.
01:06:52 Mary.
01:06:54 Process for the Indian people by trying to apply their ethics to the Indians and so it it it that is that would be considered a.
01:07:05 You know, I guess in a way, it's kind of like the.
01:07:08 The Star Trek Prime directive of you know, you're not allowed to alter the course.
01:07:14 Of more primitive groups.
01:07:17 Beyondism would say, you know their ethics are relative to them. They're, you know, if they decide that's the way they want to deal with these excess women, then that's the way they they should do it. And who knows, maybe in maybe in 1000 years, some version of that ends up being a better way to handle the excess.
01:07:37 People or you know, whatever.
01:07:39 And so that that that's that's one of the mistakes that they say that not just Christianity but most.
01:07:48 Modern religions make is this idea that your your value system, your ethics, it it should be applied to everyone regardless of situation, regardless of ethnicity, regardless of geography, regardless of everything that there should just be this universal ethics applied to.
01:08:08 Everyone that the justification for this is that it it was a revealed.
01:08:15 A A deity declared this so, and there is no no other context other than a deity has just decreed that this is the way that all humans need to be and and so therefore the there it is.
01:08:37 From a be honest point of view, this distorts natural selection. It it distorts evolution.
01:08:47 And it begins to.
01:08:50 Promote globalism. It begins to promote this. All the eggs in one basket, kind of a situation.
01:08:59 And it begins to mix the contents of the different test tubes into one test tube, which again creates all these other problems that arise from that.
01:09:13 And that they they they see that evolution depends.
01:09:17 It like it requires variation and and not only does this universalism when applied across the whole world, when you start to apply the same ethics to everybody.
01:09:30 Ethics themselves.
01:09:32 Stop evolving, meaning that if you just apply the same the same.
01:09:39 Set of rules to everyone in the world.
01:09:42 And the source of these rules are it's a divine source. It's just this is what it is. Then the ethics themselves will never.
01:09:51 Change. They will never evolve because there won't be any other test tubes with different ethics.
01:09:57 Showing another way that might be more productive and might be more effective. So you're basically stunting the the growth of humanity.
01:10:08 Not just your, your group or other or the out group you're you're stunting the growth of all of humanity by trying to apply universalist ethics.
01:10:20 One you know, one example would be for example, and here's the other. I guess the other aspect of that, I'll be honest would say.
01:10:30 That.
01:10:32 It's not just because you want variety. It's not just because you want.
01:10:38 Different versions of you know different ethical frameworks working separately, so that you can, you know, have all these different tests going on simultaneously. But it's also because it's a recognition of the reality.
01:10:54 That different groups have different ethical requirements and that different groups have different ethical requirements because they have different aptitudes, they have different motivations, different desires, and it's a recognition that groups are different.
01:11:11 And so, for example, love thy neighbor, you know it's it's pretty basic Christian concept that might work really well in your group. You know, that might work really well when dealing with other members of your group.
01:11:26 But if you try to universalize them and apply it to other groups who are genetic, who are not genetically predisposed to behave in the same way that you are, you are now perverting your relations with other groups because you're making assumptions about them that aren't real. If you think that.
01:11:47 Your ethics are universal. Not only is that a problem because of all the reasons we just discussed, you're also putting yourself at a disadvantage because you're making assumptions about other people that are not real.
01:12:00 You are saying that because ethics are universal. You're basically saying humans are universal, that there is no difference between different people, because if there was, then ethics wouldn't be universal because the two you can't have your cake and eat it too. If ethics are universal, if morality and values are universal.
01:12:21 Then really there is no difference between people because the only thing that would make.
01:12:29 Ethics.
01:12:31 And values different for different groups is if they were different. And by the way, if they are different, it works the other way around it would necessitate.
01:12:42 A different set of ethics and values for each group.
01:12:46 And so that that really is, I think more than almost anything else.
01:12:51 When it comes to Beyondism, kind of.
01:12:56 Highlighting a problem with universal universalist religions.
01:13:02 Is that it? That and that that right there, really, I think encapsulates a.
01:13:09 A a major issue with universalist religions is that if you believe that there should be 1 universal set of ethics, then you can't possibly believe in differences between races. You can't.
01:13:25 Because if there's differences between races, then there should be differences between ethics and morals and values.
01:13:34 There just should be.
01:13:36 You. You shouldn't. You shouldn't apply the same set of ethics and morals and values to groups that are fundamentally different, so you can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't say on one hand we're we're all very different people, but on the other hand, here is the the universal laws that everyone.
01:13:55 Should live by.
01:13:56 It doesn't make sense. It doesn't add up.
01:13:59 And so that is.
01:14:03 I think one thing that Beyondism, I think.
01:14:10 Articulates in a in a in a in a good way, or at least in a way that is.
01:14:15 They might give you some food for thought.
01:14:20 So that's that's that's that's.
01:14:23 Really. Really.
01:14:26 I think something for I think a lot of people who are are who believe in universalist ethics. That's something need to square.
01:14:34 Because again, you can't have it both ways either. If you're if you believe that rules apply to everyone, that everyone's the same, or at least you know to some degree or or another, they're they're pretty much the same.
01:14:46 Another aspect of Beyondism is that.
01:14:53 Like a religion.
01:14:55 Beyondism needs to satisfy.
01:15:01 Human needs psychological, human needs and and at least address.
01:15:08 The psychological human needs and explain them in the same way that a religion does, but Beyondism would say it it it's attempt to address these psychological needs that humans have.
01:15:24 Would be based on on a scientific explanation on why those needs exist and based on a scientific explanation as to how to remedy these these issues and rather and it would, it would describe religions dealing with these these very real things.
01:15:45 By creating myths and imaginary scenarios that would psychologically soothe the the the problems away. So for example.
01:16:00 So.
01:16:02 You know, thinking of an afterlife, you know, to explain or to remedy the fear of mortality that all live living beings of a certain level of intelligence, once they become intelligent enough to be able to realize that they're going to die, they begin to fear this.
01:16:21 And if you don't address that, it would become debilitating. You wouldn't be able to make it through life.
01:16:29 Because this fear could potentially paralyze you, because you would, you would be afraid of taking risks. You would be afraid of anything that could potentially, you know, endanger your life would would be off the table if you thought that, you know, that was it, and it would just, you know.
01:16:47 It's really scary and so.
01:16:50 Beyondism would say, you know, we seek to address these same fears, but we're not going to make up some story about it. We're going to try to come up.
01:16:58 With rational reasons.
01:17:00 For why you shouldn't for your death. And it also would say that a lot of the source.
01:17:09 Of these psychological.
01:17:12 Issues that humanity has it's, and this is a concept we'll get to in a moment. It's a result of what? What?
01:17:22 Beyondism describes as genetic lag.
01:17:26 And genetic lag.
01:17:29 Is to put it simply, it's that culture and innovation and technology progresses faster than genetics and the genetic lag is the the.
01:17:46 The fact that we as people Live Today, for example, this is a perfect example people Live Today.
01:17:54 We did not evolve an environment that included the Internet as an example, and so the issues that that arise out of access to the Internet that that humans run.
01:18:08 Into is a product of what, Beyondism, would call genetic lag that we didn't. We haven't had the Internet long enough to actually evolve away the the problems that are caused by having this access to this new technology. And so anytime you have these, these leaps.
01:18:29 In cult.
01:18:30 Or these leaps in technology, you're always going to have at least a period of genetic lag. And because technology and culture is always progressing faster than biology, you always have genetic lag. And so a lot of these.
01:18:49 Urges that we have or that create these psychological issues that religion seeks to address. A lot of them are a product of genetic lag. So, for example, a lot of your baser instincts.
01:19:05 That are no longer relevant are that that religion seeks to help people deal with by by creating explanations for, you know, like, why? Why a human might want to.
01:19:26 Indulge in in in premarital sex and and why they you know why human might want to steal or lie or murder when Beyondism would say these are just vestige impulses. These are just leftover impulses from a more primitive time.
01:19:46 And that technology and society has evolved faster than our biology has. And so we have these leftover impulses and these leftover desires, and these leftover feelings that may.
01:20:00 Because have psychological conflicts with the the.
01:20:08 More evolved technology and society that we exist in and and so that religion is seeking to address this genetic lag. That or the issues that arise from this genetic lag and that Beyondism is is also trying to alleviate these issues.
01:20:29 But by giving them a more rational explanation.
01:20:33 They can address them more, more easily and more effectively because they're not applying some kind of mysticism to these impulses, but rather.
01:20:46 Trying to address these in a in a.
01:20:51 In a more objective way and and and less of a supernatural or or subjective.
01:20:57 Right. So for example, they would say that you know this misalignment between your genetic urges. Oh, another thing would be like food, right? Like we all have these genetic urges to eat. High calorie, you know, foods. And So what happens in the West when all of a sudden.
01:21:19 The calorie food becomes easily accessible. Everyone gets super fat because the genetic.
01:21:27 Lag where we have not evolved in this environment where there's all this food everywhere. And so we're still slaves to this desire to eat all this food, and a religion might say might explain this by, oh, that's gluttony. It's, you know, it's lack of self-control and and they they would.
01:21:48 They would. They would address the same problem, but using you know what, Beyondism would describe as mystical metaphors in order to try to address these issues.
01:21:59 Uh.
01:22:01 Whereas Beyondism, because it's Beyondism is, is beyond, ISM would say it's it would be more effective at dealing with these issues because a it it's more rationality based. But it's also because this is this sort of issue is always going to be changing, right.
01:22:20 Like, you know, people, let's not think of it religiously so much as the Constitution, right? Where people would say, well, the Constitution.
01:22:30 They'll make arguments about freedom of speech and say or or even, you know, the right to bear arms, saying that, well, the Constitution didn't anticipate automatic weapons or it didn't anticipate the Internet or didn't anticipate this or that.
01:22:45 And and try to say that you know the the the morality I guess dictated in the in the values dictated in the Constitution.
01:22:55 Are not because you know, because technology keeps progressing, it's not equipped to handle the the new technology and to be honest would say the same is true of of religion, where religion set up a value system that was relevant to people 2000 years ago with technology.
01:23:13 2000 years ago and that as technology progresses, it's ill equipped to handle these new.
01:23:24 Ethical.
01:23:25 Problems that that pop up. But because Beyondism is is centered around evolution.
01:23:33 And and for whatever is best for the that group's survival, and whatever is best for that group's thriving that those ethics would also evolve, that it would not just be these written in stone rules that we live by these rules under any circumstances and those circumstances.
01:23:53 Gained biological, geographical whatever. Everyone lives by these rules, Beyondism, would say.
01:24:00 Actually, we live by these rules until we don't. We live by these rules until we can determine that these rules are no longer helping us survive and thrive. The moment that these rules are preventing us from surviving and thriving, those rules necessarily necessarily have to change. Not that they should or can be changed.
01:24:20 They need to change because they no longer promote the the survival and thriving of our people.
01:24:32 Let's see here.
01:24:39 Another another aspect of Beyond is is that.
01:24:47 It doesn't believe in.
01:24:50 Or it doesn't promote the idea of a God or an afterlife.
01:24:56 Or a heaven or or anything like that.
01:24:59 But instead that.
01:25:01 The your your sense of of immortality.
01:25:05 Would come from your contribution because the the whole focus of Beyondism is the perpetuation of your race, the improvement of your race, the evolution of your race.
01:25:19 The survival of your race, therefore, any sense of immortality, which is something that a lot of humans need as a result of their their knowledge of their own mortality, that one of the reasons why they need this sense of immortality or this solution of immortality to sue them from the problem of.
01:25:39 Their mortality beyond as it would address this, by making a culture of of immortality around your contribution, your legacy being your contribution to the survival and the improvement of your race and your pet.
01:25:58 And that that would not only that would not only address the issue that individuals would have in terms of a a need to have a.
01:26:11 To alleviate this fear of their own mortality, but it also would increase the output of the race if everyone was driven by a A A need to have a legacy that was centered around the survival and the improvement of their race. So beyond this it would make the argument that.
01:26:32 This would be superior to most modern, or really all modern religions, because most modern, well, let's say most I don't know if it's all, but most modern religions deals with the problem of mentality by providing a alternate the alternative.
01:26:51 That well, no, you don't just die and cease to.
01:26:55 Exist, you die. And then if you were a good person and look in some ways it addresses it in a in a in a way that also promotes the well-being of your people. Because like Christianity as an example would say, well, you die and then you go to the gates of heaven and Saint Peter or whoever right you get judged.
01:27:15 Based on how you treated your fellow man and if you were a good person or not, and if you were a generally a good person, then you get to, you know, move on to the next level and of something good. And in fact, you're there. There's not just a carrot. There's also a.
01:27:32 Click where if you.
01:27:35 And I guess you could say Christians gonna maybe even make the argument this is something would make it superior is that in addition to having the carrot that you get to move on to heaven, but if you're a bad person, then you actually are tortured for eternity and and and hell.
01:27:51 And so that you could make the argument that if you were, if it weren't for the universalist aspects of.
01:28:00 This theology, and if it were just focused on, were you good to other white people just, you know, in the in the through the lens of of of a you know a a pro white worldview if if you limited it to just the your interactions to or at least prioritized the your actions to.
01:28:20 Other white people that it would actually address this in a superior way because Beyondism doesn't really have a stick. It's more just a a carrot. I guess the stick would be that you, you know that you didn't contribute, but there's that's not much of a stick.
01:28:35 Beyondism would say, though, that.
01:28:37 It it it fulfills this need and simultaneously it promotes the progress of your race and your people by making everything about your legacy and everything about you know how you.
01:28:58 How you contributed to your people?
01:29:02 And that uh.
01:29:05 They would also say that one of the differences would be that in Christianity, and really all other human religions.
01:29:17 And and this is one other area where I think probably.
01:29:23 Other you know, other contemporary religions would look at beyond us and say this is this is a major flaw.
01:29:31 In these these other religions.
01:29:33 Even if they're universalists, they believe that.
01:29:37 Humans are are unique. Humans are special. Humans are favored by God. Humans are above all the other life forms, and there's something.
01:29:52 Even divine in some way about humans, because we're created in God's image.
01:29:59 And that we're special in this way. Whereas Beyondism would depart from that that worldview and say that while you should still keep.
01:30:08 Only acting in the interest of your race and so obviously your species.
01:30:14 There is nothing special about humans. We are just one of many species and that every species is in competition with each.
01:30:23 Other and that you are special and that you should your priority should be with your species, but there's nothing divinely.
01:30:32 Better about your species that you know if, if if we're going to be completely emotionally detached from everything, which it seems like Beyondism, really, really focuses on and is being.
01:30:45 Hyper rational about everything that there is nothing special about humanity.
01:30:51 That is just one of many species in competition with all the other species and subspecies.
01:30:59 And that the the universe, neither favorably or unfavorably, looks at at humans as as different that that nature is completely indifferent to the existence of humans, and that we are we are equally.
01:31:18 We're on equal footing basically other than our our, I guess our our.
01:31:24 Our progress in the evolutionary timeline, we're on equal footing with every other animal that exists.
01:31:35 And this is, I guess where Beyondism would say?
01:31:40 That and this is this, I guess. I guess this is this would be one of the weak spots for Beyondism for multiple to the reasons. One is even if you agree with that, even if you agree that humans are are essentially on equal footing with every other living being that and that.
01:31:58 That doesn't mean that we, you know, we don't value ourselves.
01:32:02 More we do, every group should value themselves, as you know, prioritize themselves.
01:32:09 But that that concept, that idea that we're not divine, that we're not special, that we're not.
01:32:17 Different than every other living being that that it would have some bad side effects psychologically and that it would, it would call for a an emotional detachment that humans are just not.
01:32:31 They they just don't have. We're not robots. And and I think that's one of the issues with Beyondism is that it kind of treats.
01:32:40 Human.
01:32:40 Things.
01:32:42 Like they're robots, you know, like or. Or maybe they're not robots. They're emotional robots with the capacity to to detach themselves from their emotions.
01:32:54 And and which, you know, humans have proven again and again they're they're not. They're not capable of doing that.
01:33:03 And so the this idea that this new spirituality.
01:33:07 Would manifest.
01:33:11 In a way that would still give people a sense of purpose, just by advancing your groups.
01:33:18 Evolution.
01:33:20 I I don't. I just don't think that's a big enough carrot for a.
01:33:22 Lot of people.
01:33:26 And this also becomes and look this is evident.
01:33:30 And and I guess psychologically you could say a a good example of how this would never shake out. Just look at the problems we have with even people that are flat Earthers.
01:33:40 Right. The reason why a lot of that exists is they are perplexed by and also fear the vastness of the universe. The idea that maybe they're not special, the idea that maybe they're not, you know, on in some specially, you know, tailored Flat Earth magical Flat Earth.
01:34:01 That's made for them the the idea they they have to believe that that dinosaurs are fake and that space is fake. And you know, because they it's precisely because they can't. They can't detach themselves emotionally.
01:34:15 Or view themselves as not special, and that's an extreme example.
01:34:21 And but I think that that would be that that's a huge issue. And then also you have.
01:34:29 The idea that you would be able to address people's fear of mortality.
01:34:36 Strictly based on some kind of rational argument.
01:34:39 You know this rational argument, though, no, it's it's it's it's fine that you're going to die and cease to exist because you'll have helped to progress your people and evolve your people. I mean, I guess some people will be able to rationally do that. And I think some people do rationally do that. And I think that maybe because if you under it in a be honest.
01:35:00 Worldview there would be more of an emphasis put on because of the emphasis on on survival and on evolution.
01:35:06 And there would be more of an emphasis on having healthy, good children. That also would have healthy, good children and that maybe you'd be able to get some sense of mortality out of that. You know that that not only are you trying to leave your mark and have a legacy in terms of improving the overall health and destiny of the group.
01:35:26 But that you're actually physically contributing to that by having children, maybe you could get that. But I still think that that this, the fear of your own mortality is bigger than that. I think that that that's a problem that that would still persist.
01:35:47 I don't know, unless I guess you could break it out of people somehow, right?
01:35:53 So another aspect of of Beyondism is that.
01:36:00 Your ethical loyalty.
01:36:03 To your own group.
01:36:07 It exceeds.
01:36:09 And we've heard kind of already talked about this, but your loyalty to your own group should be prioritized above your loyalty to mankind, general.
01:36:21 And the only time that that should change is if there is a threat to the survival of mankind generally. So in other words, if there was maybe some disease that would equally affect all groups and wipe us all out unless we were to cooperate.
01:36:39 To fight off this disease.
01:36:42 Unless there's a circumstance like that, you should always prioritize the survival of your own group, and that means prioritizing resources.
01:36:52 For the support of your own community over the support of distant strangers, that and that all of your resources should be put towards your group and that, I think is a.
01:37:08 A major issue with with. I think the more charity centric religious views that a lot of people have today.
01:37:18 There and and This is why it doesn't work. One of the reasons why Christianity might see, I think there's a lot of people that look at Christianity and say, well, it worked like 300 years ago and it seemed to work. Even this idea of charity, this idea of turning the other cheek and and and they they're they're looking at how it's it's maybe.
01:37:40 High and they they see it as maybe being hijacked by by bad actors.
01:37:45 And or or maybe?
01:37:49 This sense is inflated and and distorted and creates problems by redirecting resources that should be put towards the promotion and the success of your people into redirecting these resources to other places. And this is how you get situations where.
01:38:10 Like Africa, as an example, has this population boom that.
01:38:15 A beyond list would argue well under Beyondism, these motherfuckers in in Africa would be dying left and right of malaria. They'd be dying left and right of AIDS. They'd be dying left and right of of starvation. And I mean the population of Africa would be just a fraction, a sliver.
01:38:35 Of what it is now, and that the only reason why you have this this great migration of Africans into the rest of the world is precisely because you had this.
01:38:52 Charitable This this value of charity, that that whose origin is some could argue in in Christendom and in in Christianity, being extended to the out.
01:39:06 Group.
01:39:07 Being extended and that's and that really is an issue and that and that's that's really what you could.
01:39:12 I mean, you really could make that argument that one of the things that is that is creating this perilous situation for white.
01:39:20 People is that these values that say 203 hundred years ago, these Christian values that would normally only apply to your your, your group. You know that this, you know, being charitable to your own people trying to uplift your own people. It is being extended now to the out group.
01:39:40 And I guess the the real question here is, is that really a product of Christianity being?
01:39:48 And hijacked by bad actors or by naive people and and being weaponized in in a way so that you're taking food out of the mouths of your own people and shoveling it into the mouths of Africans and others. And, you know, opening up your borders and welcoming everybody and all this other stuff.
01:40:10 Or was that always the way Christianity was, and it's just that you didn't have the technology that made it a?
01:40:17 Well.
01:40:19 In other words, it's like.
01:40:22 To put it in another way and and and and I guess and be honest, would he would, he would even say this is kind of like the genetic lag thing, right. But to put it in another way, think of it like this Windows XP is no longer supported by Microsoft when Windows XP was supported by Microsoft.
01:40:42 And there weren't all these exploits in zero days that were that made it easy for you to hijack a Windows XP machine if it were connected to the Internet. It didn't matter that it had all these exploits, all and all these exploits existed. You know, all these exploits that they were always patching or whatever, they always existed. It's just the technology.
01:41:02 Didn't exist to take advantage of those exploits.
01:41:06 And likewise, you could say all these all these vulnerabilities.
01:41:11 That are being taken advantage of that seemingly Christianity has that are being leveraged by people that want to flood your country full of Africans and other and similar issues. You could say Christianity always had these exploits, it's just that the technology for mass movement of peoples.
01:41:31 For the mass redistribution of of your your wealth.
01:41:36 Didn't exist, so that even if you had these these these these vulnerabilities and these tendencies in Christianity, say 200 years ago, the technology didn't exist to really exploit those issues and and make it a make it a problem. And so that's where I think of beyond us would say.
01:41:56 Well.
01:41:57 Because our ethics are evolving and always centered around what's good for us, if a situation arises where something that was beneficial to our people begins to be exploited and used against us, then.
01:42:14 Instantly that that value changes because it no longer lives up to the ultimate value, which is the existence and progress of our individual group. The second it starts being used against us it it ceases to be a valid A valid value.
01:42:34 Whereas with Christianity you might have things that would have worked great maybe 2-3 hundred years ago, when the when the historical context is different when the the geopolitical reality is different. And then once the geopolitical reality changes, the technology changes. Now all of a sudden you have things that would have been.
01:42:55 Beneficial to your race? Become things that are easily exploited and used as a weapon against you, and there's no mechanism in which you can go and change this, and I think that's that's really that really gets to the heart of what a lot of people who.
01:43:09 Criticized Christianity.
01:43:12 I think maybe they don't articulate very well and or if they do articulate, they do it in a disrespectful way. That's not going to be considered by Christians and that is there is no mechanism.
01:43:25 For which to reform some of these issues and and partially and and it depends on which one you're talking about. Specifically, part of that is because if the source of your ethics, if the source of your rules, if the source of your theology is.
01:43:43 Divine revelation or or what have you, but it comes from a source, a supernatural source of deity, and it's therefore unchanging and it's therefore real and universal for eternity.
01:44:00 What really could be your your mechanism for changing that other than divine intervention like you'd have to have? And if that is the case, you really would have to have God coming and appearing to people on Earth and saying I've changed my mind, which seemed to be happening all the time in the Bible, but hasn't happened, you know, for 2000 years.
01:44:21 And so with without a mechanism to change that, you get yourself into some sticky situations.
01:44:28 And in that, I guess would be something that Beyondism would say, well we we you know Beyondism would would remedy this issue by by.
01:44:40 Not, not just having the ability to reform your ethics, but demanding the reform of your ethics the moment it it ceases to promote the ascension of your people.
01:44:55 Umm.
01:44:57 Let's see here.
01:45:00 The next I guess, aspect of Beyondism.
01:45:04 Is that the the real test?
01:45:08 Of whether the group's culture and genetics are good.
01:45:13 Is whether or not that group thrives and survives overtime.
01:45:18 And that if it doesn't, then necessarily that means that there is an issue with that group's genetics and or culture.
01:45:29 And that if and that's really that's it's it's as simple as that.
01:45:33 If over a period of 100 years your group is lagging behind.
01:45:38 Other groups? That means that your that necessarily means your genetics or your culture or both.
01:45:47 Are inferior.
01:45:50 There are issues.
01:45:52 And that the only only way to address those issues would be to attempt to adopt.
01:45:59 A in a very precise.
01:46:02 Methodical.
01:46:04 Way the genetics and cultures of other groups.
01:46:09 Now this is where I think a lot of white nationalists might even depart from Beyondism, because he suggests that if a group begins to lag.
01:46:22 There's like a tightrope you're kind of walking along because in one way.
01:46:26 It suggests that that group needs to disappear, that that group needs to cease to exist because it's it's failing and natural selection is is selecting it out.
01:46:39 But.
01:46:41 You might have a circumstance where.
01:46:45 That's not preferable because Beyondism also wants to maintain this diversity. All these different test tubes. So if you start getting rid of test tubes, you start to defeat the whole purpose of maintaining these separate genetic groups. If the number of those groups starts to decrease.
01:47:07 And so.
01:47:09 While you want to prioritize your group, other groups also want to prioritize their groups, and it might become a a advantageous thing for a group to want to adopt the genetic makeup.
01:47:24 You know, in in a targeted way like look in other words selecting for traits like if let's say you had a you know let's just use a real world example. Let's say you have a an African country that's failing.
01:47:36 Because they aren't, you know, all the other countries stop giving it aid. They're all looking out for themselves. And these African countries are no longer able to self sustain their culture socks. They're not they lack the ability to really kind of enact any kind of new cult. They can't adopt AA new culture that they're.
01:47:57 Genetically unable to maintain, so they come to the conclusion maybe that they need to adopt the genetics of another group.
01:48:07 And so again, this is where like I think a lot of race realists would would get uncomfortable, they they would want to therefore start looking for groups that have traits that are desirable and start a program of genetically introducing those traits to their group, which would mean.
01:48:27 Inbreeding of you know whether it's artificial or not, that's what they would they would seek to do. And Beyondism would would support this is Beyondism doesn't favor as much as it it in in a lot of ways.
01:48:41 Is it does seem to fit nicely with a lot of white nationalist viewpoints. It ultimately is looking for the the progress of of it. It sees itself as a solution for the ultimate.
01:48:57 Progress of mankind generally, and just because it seems like a great idea for white people now just because.
01:49:04 We are in many ways we would we would thrive, I think under the system it does introduce these kind of weird situations where you'd be you'd be genetically experiment. Yeah, I guess experimenting with with these other groups. Once they started failing in the hopes in a way. I mean, you think of it kind of like with my.
01:49:24 My beekeeping right where if I had bees that were that were starting to not produce as much honey and I had some other kind of bees that were, I would, you know, maybe I'd mix the genetics up a little bit.
01:49:35 And this is, I think, where people get uncomfortable, where they would prefer to keep groups separate and let them fail. And if it meant that there were fewer test tubes, it's not a.
01:49:46 Big deal.
01:49:48 So that that is 1. I think major departure that Beyondism has from.
01:49:55 You know, I think the worldview of a lot of.
01:49:57 White nationalists there.
01:49:59 UM.
01:50:01 Let's see here another another aspect of Beyondism is that.
01:50:09 Both genes and culture.
01:50:13 Evolve through natural selection.
01:50:17 And.
01:50:19 While we kind of have a good understanding of how genes evolve through natural selection, that cultural.
01:50:28 Evolution is a lot more chaotic.
01:50:32 And a lot harder to predict.
01:50:35 And so therefore it's harder to govern and harder to.
01:50:42 Foster a positive.
01:50:46 Environment for, you know, a culture that's always going to be superior because.
01:50:53 And even with genetics, it's hard to do that too. I think that when when he was writing this, there was a more simplistic view of.
01:50:59 Genetics.
01:51:00 Because you you always get maybe unintended consequences even if you start messing with genetics, you might think a trait is positive and then you find out that you know by increasing your resistance.
01:51:13 To say this disease, you've actually inadvertently created some.
01:51:17 Other genetic issue, right?
01:51:19 And and the same thing is true of of cultural evolution, right? Let's say that your culture.
01:51:27 Thinks that there's a major problem with creativity and so they need to be less regimented and less strict about certain aspects of of of how they they educate people and be more open minded. In this sort of a thing.
01:51:45 And.
01:51:45 Then where do you draw the line?
01:51:47 Where you know where do you start to go into like hippie mode and start just getting too open minded about everything and and it becomes self-destructive.
01:51:55 And so another aspect of of what he wrote about was that because we don't know.
01:52:02 As much about cultural evolution, a lot of the resources available to each group should be dedicated to the research of of how that takes place. And of course that was his field of study. And so I think some of that.
01:52:17 Was a little some of.
01:52:19 That was a little, you know.
01:52:23 I guess.
01:52:25 In favour of his own. You know his own.
01:52:30 Funding.
01:52:33 That, you know, like his, his theology made sure to focus on funding his field of study, you know? Go figure.
01:52:41 So.
01:52:42 That, that's that's 11 aspect of his of his writing about Beyondism. And the other thing was that they are that that cultural and and or cultural evolution is too.
01:52:58 Guide to genetic evolution in in a way that you can't separate the 2 meaning that while you could say that some cultural advancements are are are universal in their in the benefit that they give meaning for example.
01:53:18 Like written language.
01:53:21 Is a cultural advancement and that it's hard to imagine a genetic group that wouldn't benefit from having a written language, and so you could say that these cultural advancements are universal.
01:53:40 But.
01:53:41 A1 It's a mistake to therefore say that they're going to be universally good to all people in the same way, because an invention like like a written language. While it might be you might be able to apply it to all groups universally.
01:54:02 Regardless of their genetics, or at least you know, to the degree that they're capable of of reading and writing, you know there is some kind of.
01:54:08 There.
01:54:08 Is a level of of advancement in you know that you have to have in order to be able to to read and write.
01:54:17 There is also going to be a a genetic suitability difference, you know, because if if you have.
01:54:27 A population with an average IQ of of.
01:54:32 120 versus a population with an average IQ of 80.
01:54:37 Not just, it's not just going to be the application of reading and writing is going to be different, but, but even just the degree to which you can read and write if you want a good example of this, all you have to do.
01:54:47 Is.
01:54:47 Look at the BBC's publication of the Pigeon English.
01:54:52 Version of the news. It's like baby talk. It's insane that they even have that, but they're they publish news for low IQ black people in like, low IQ black people. Baby talk because that's all they can really understand. And so.
01:55:10 This is another I guess situation where, Beyondism, seeks to highlight.
01:55:18 The fact that there are huge genetic differences and demonstrate situations where this is so and this is one of those situations where it is so you can't just assume, for example, that Internet like Internet access, you could say the same thing. Internet access might be a great boon to a.
01:55:38 A group that is technologically savvy and is is psychologically developed enough to handle this kind of Internet access.
01:55:48 But you give it to another group, A more primitive group, and it actually ends up being a detriment. Another good example of this is of something like this. It's a lot more easy to wrap your head around. Is just the fact that it's something that we've touched on a.
01:56:01 Little bit before the.
01:56:02 The you know, Native Americans going from a.
01:56:07 A society that has to wrestle their food to the ground like you have.
01:56:11 To.
01:56:11 Go take a Buffalo out and and that's your food for the the week or whatever too you can.
01:56:18 Get Uber eats now. You don't have to do anything and the result is you get all this obesity and all the all these issues. So or or like the example that I've used a bunch of times where you give.
01:56:32 The the AK47 to the chimpanzee it's like, OK, you can make the argument that having firearms is benefits.
01:56:42 Group, but it doesn't benefit all groups the same way and it might not benefit all groups. Generally the same technology, technological advance the benefits. One group might actually be detrimental to another group, and so that's another I guess.
01:57:01 Way that that Beyondism.
01:57:05 Effectively articulates that there is a difference genetically between peoples and some of the consequences of that are that we just as we shouldn't be universalists in our thinking when it.
01:57:19 Comes to ethics.
01:57:21 We shouldn't be universalist in our thinking when it comes to.
01:57:25 Access to technologies.
01:57:27 And that we shouldn't just assume that because we've invented some technology that is, that is really great for us as as our group that we should just assume that that that technology would be effective in other populations. And really this is an indictment of.
01:57:46 Of the kind of this could also apply to, like the kind of thinking that you saw from neocons right in the 1990s where they thought that all all you have to do is go to the Middle East and topple a a dictator and give them democracy, which you could consider it kind of technology, a cultural technology.
01:58:05 And that magically, they would all start to resemble Western countries. And then, of course, everyone's surprised when they don't because their universalist worldview, this idea that all ethics should be applied universally to all groups because we're all the same, because we're all God's children and yada, yada, yada. That doesn't actually work out because we.
01:58:25 We we are different and our ethics and our rules and our values should be different and should be tailored to our specific.
01:58:32 Groups and should not be applied to all groups equally, and that should include technology, and that should include cultural advancements.
01:58:42 So that's, that's another instance where I think Beyondism offers a a fairly good articulation of of of, of differences between groups and and recognizes something that a lot of religions.
01:58:58 And just societies, you know, even if they're not religious, don't recognize the fact that just because, you know a technology is good for you doesn't mean it's good.
01:59:07 For everybody.
01:59:10 The other issue that that Beyondism tackles and this is something that I thought I found kind of insightful, I never really.
01:59:18 Thought of it this way and I don't know why, but Beyondism recognizes that.
01:59:26 One of the issues you have.
01:59:29 With the adoption of new technologies and cultural advancements, is.
01:59:37 You have to remember that.
01:59:41 The cultural advancements and new technologies are the products of the most exceptional people of your group.
01:59:51 That these advancements are typically the result of, you might even say, a biological mutation.
02:00:01 So meaning that someone is exceptional because they're their genetics is basically it's a mutation like they they're that exceptional, they're that high IQ.
02:00:12 They're that outside the norm because they're kind of a mutation. And so the product of these people, the, the these exceptional minds that that creates these new technologies and these new philosophies, they are so foreign.
02:00:31 To the average person, like the average person is not out there inventing or you know, reinventing the wheel and inventing all these new breakthrough technologies, right that.
02:00:41 They're not there, and so they're ill equipped to adopt them when they appear. And so Beyondism recognizes that when you, unlike when you have a biological mutation where this this adaptation.
02:01:01 Through natural selection, evolution, inevitably.
02:01:07 For the most part, gets incorporated into the rest of the population.
02:01:14 Through its own little process that that a cultural mutation that's advantageous while it does go through the same process, we need to recognize it might also take just as long to be adopted that that it's easy for you and I to conceptualize.
02:01:32 That if someone you know, like let's say.
02:01:35 A someone's genes make them a immune to cancer for some reason. They give it enough generations eventually. Can't everyone would be immune to cancer or or. Or maybe this has already happened with other problems that killed us even younger because.
02:01:55 You would be killed before your ability to reproduce. If you had the you know, if you didn't have the genes that made you immune to that disorder, those genes would eventually get weeded out because everyone that was immune would survive long enough to have enough kids versus the people that weren't in.
02:02:11 Right. But it's not as easy for us to wrap our head around the fact that that's also kind of how?
02:02:17 The adoption of new technologies and new cultural advancements takes place that that it takes a long time for these these mutations. These cultural mutations these these technological mutations to be adopted by everybody else because of the genetic lag.
02:02:38 The the lag of like everyone is not a product we're not.
02:02:42 The product we didn't evolve in the environment where this technology existed, so no one really is suited to, I mean some people will just buy an accident of genetics, be more suited than others to adopt this new technology or this new cultural invention or whatever. But generally speaking, nobody is evolved to.
02:03:03 To be compatible with the Internet as an example, and again just through genetic accident, some people will be more.
02:03:11 Able to handle and utilize the Internet than others, but no one evolved in an environment with the Internet and so there's there's no adaptation to the Internet, or at least not for a long time. It will take several generations before people adapt to it, and it's it's so there. There's a recognition of this.
02:03:31 When it comes to Beyondism that I I found unique, I don't think that many people have really articulated.
02:03:40 The the adoption of disruptive technologies in this way in that they themselves are mutations and that they take.
02:03:50 As long if not longer to really take hold in some instances as a genetic mutation that would, that would alter the genetic makeup of a people.
02:04:02 So I found that interesting that you would have this and and this. This is also because of this. This also highlights or at least underlines the fact that different genetic groups are going to adopt and utilize these technologies differently.
02:04:24 Another aspect of Beyondism is that a lot of a lot of people, you might even hear people say I've heard it said.
02:04:35 That humans are the only they're the only animals that instead of adapting to their environment, they adapt their instead of adapting their environment to to be more suited for it. They adapt their environment to more to more easily suit them.
02:04:54 And this is a. This is according to Beyondism. This is false that that is not quite true, that every animal to some degree adapts their environment. You know, whether you're talking about an Ant that will, that will create an Ant hill or a Beaver that will create a dam or or whatever.
02:05:13 Thinking that humans are unique in that we have the ability to somehow adapt to our environment and totally reshape, you know, the environment to fit whatever we want and no other animals doing that that that's false. That other animals are doing that and that also it kind of takes away.
02:05:33 From.
02:05:35 From the idea that we are all influenced by our environments, especially if you look at the different races, we're all a product of our, you know, several generations of of different environments.
02:05:52 The the other thing that they focus on.
02:05:55 Under the same vein is that.
02:06:00 That we create two we when we alter our environment we we create you could also call it creating you know technology or creating culture something that often Beyondism kind of mixes the 2 is is one thing but that there's two types Beyondism says of of cultural or technological.
02:06:21 Advancements. Well really, I guess that is the two types or the way that we would a lot of people describe it today and that is that there is pee culture.
02:06:34 And our culture.
02:06:37 And Beyondism describes this PC culture and our culture as P as being culture such as art.
02:06:46 And you know, like poetry or or, you know, like architecture and design. And, you know, this sort of a thing, whereas our culture is more about engineering.
02:07:01 And more about, you know, the hard sciences.
02:07:05 And in fact, I would say that Beyondism doesn't say this. But when I when I read this, it kind of made me think about how a lot of other like non whites especially will comment on how oh white people don't have a culture.
02:07:22 And it was very popular thing in in when I was growing up for even white people to to if you thought of the word culture, you were thinking about cultures of non whites. You didn't think of of culture as.
02:07:39 As something that was white and not that whites don't have a culture and there's a lot of people that of course focus a lot on reviving, you know, and trying to alter this, this.
02:07:52 Anti white view of things basically that we don't have the culture, but I think one of the reasons why that that actually was that, that worldview was so easily easy for white people to adopt.
02:08:06 Wise that there wasn't this differentiation being made between, you know, not that the obviously the white people have never contributed to poetry and things like that. We have Shakespeare, obviously, you know, things like this. We have culture.
02:08:20 But the the culture that is most pervasive in the world that comes from white people would be what, beyond this, would categorize as our culture. Where, you know, it's more technological output, it's more engineering output. And that I think that and one of the great things really about white people is that we are.
02:08:40 Are or are the very least more focused and our output is more.
02:08:47 Heavily in the in the side of our culture or what? Beyond is called our culture, which is the technology output, the technological output, the discovery output, the the science output, and all you have to do is look at the world and look at where the origin of of of.
02:09:07 Even like the foundations of science, all the way up to the most, you know, advanced technology, where is it coming from? It's white.
02:09:13 People. And because that's not considered culture in at least in the way you know, people popularly talk about culture, it's often ignored as and and and and so it takes away from the cultural, or at least what's viewed as the cultural output of white.
02:09:31 People.
02:09:32 When the way beyond.
02:09:33 Looks at it is.
02:09:35 You know these kinds of inventions that these technological advancements, these scientific advancements, that is cultural output. It's just they categorize it as our culture versus peak culture.
02:09:52 So I found that interesting is, you know, because it's if when you think about it, it really is kind of true when you start to.
02:10:00 It's an interesting way to articulate it, and it is something that I in the past I have sought to articulate. I remember getting into an argument with a a Mexican guy, once many, many, many years ago, because he made that same argument to me. He was saying ohh there's no such thing as white culture and I was like, what are you talking about? And and I at the time.
02:10:21 I was in my head equating a lot of our technological advancements as as our cultural output because I said I think I said something. You know, this was, I was a lot younger than I and so I didn't articulate it the best way, but I I basically said something like, oh, if we don't have any cultural or culture.
02:10:40 How do you explain you know the the Internet and and radio? And he's like, oh, those are just inventions and it's like.
02:10:49 Well, OK, but that is cultural output. It's cultural output, and in fact, in a way, it's it's superior to the superior, but it's it's superior in terms of its advancement of humankind.
02:11:08 The our culture versus PC culture because it's our culture, not only.
02:11:13 Is it is it's more tangible, but it's also something that can be more easily adopted by other groups. To advance them, you know, advance those groups, which is not necessarily good for us, but it's, you know, it's good for everybody else.
02:11:32 All right, don't worry guys.
02:11:36 I know this is is kind of.
02:11:38 Yeah.
02:11:40 I'm trying not to get too in the weeds with this stuff. I'm trying to be as I'm just trying to give people things to think about. I found this interesting and it made it made the wheels turn when thinking about different things. That's all I'm trying to do. I'm just trying to get your your creative juices going and for you to to just, you know, think about.
02:12:00 Some new ideas, that's all I'm not. I'm definitely. I'm definitely not advocating for beyond gism. I'm not a be honest, but I just, you know, this is a very intelligent white guy who had it, had a lot of ideas and some of them are good. Some of them are good. Not all of them.
02:12:18 So the next thing that that Beyondism focuses on.
02:12:22 Is that eugenics?
02:12:26 Should be taken up by by every group to improve.
02:12:32 Their gene pool.
02:12:34 That they should, because that if you think about it, Beyondism is driven by the idea that we are, you know that we are, we should be in harmony with evolution and natural selection well and therefore we should try to streamline that process. And so there should be a deliberate eugenic.
02:12:55 Purpose to our group that there should be rules governing the genetic output of our group if one of the goals of our group is to.
02:13:14 Improve the genetic output of our group. Then we should be doing things proactively that address that and things that also help reduce because Beyondism sees a lot of the.
02:13:31 The the problems of humans as a result of that genetic lag that we were talking about before that, the fact that that we're always, we're always less evolved than our our current technology that we should then try to proactively speed up.
02:13:51 That evolution to be more suited to interface with that technology and that.
02:13:58 That would reduce the genetic lag and that would also increase the.
02:14:04 The the technological output of our people because more.
02:14:08 People would be.
02:14:11 Evolved to use the existing technology, which would then increase innovation.
02:14:17 And that that, that's that's of course a big taboo with literally almost everybody eugenics post World War 2 has become a big naughty word and has been relegated to.
02:14:34 The same the same status as genocide in a way. That's the way people people look at eugenics. It's like if you say that you're a eugenicist, you might as well be saying you're you believe in genocide, and that's how they view it. But if you're, if you are, if your ethics are.
02:14:53 All based on what is best for the improvement of your group.
02:14:58 Then eugenics is a is a no brainer and it should be just just as much as you should have governance that promotes innovation and technology or in cultural output. And we do. We do have government programs that subsidize art and subsidized technology.
02:15:19 And subsidized innovation.
02:15:21 Then we should also have governments that subsidize.
02:15:28 Eugenic. Genetic. Not just the research, but the implementation. And and by the way, that's the way that our country in America was going prior to World War 2. That's exactly what was happening. We had eugenics, we had eugenic laws on the books, in in, in several states that were upheld by the Supreme Court.
02:15:50 You know, proactively getting rid of.
02:15:52 Of bad genes was the focus and not so much trying to increase the good genes. And I would say that that's where be honest would would probably depart from.
02:16:04 Or want to, I guess, accelerate eugenics.
02:16:07 Because the the implementation.
02:16:10 That was in in use prior to World War 2 in America was basically just ending the bad genes, not so much. Promoting the good genes.
02:16:21 But you could say it would even be eugenic without having to say, like you know, without having to create weird rules where you are directing, you know, this person that must breed with this person because we've we've analyzed their traits. And if we make, you know, we we're going to breed them like horses or race horses.
02:16:41 And shit like that.
02:16:42 You you don't even necessarily have to do that so much as you can let natural selection take place simply by removing the the welfare and social programs that make natural selection.
02:17:01 Impossible where you know all you have to do in order for to have a eugenic effect on your gene pool is to stop punishing the high performers and and saddling them with the the responsibility of paying for the low performers.
02:17:23 While simultaneously sterilizing the ultra low performers, and by that I mean people who are mentally retarded, people that are rapists and murderers, and and that that's just imagine if that's all we did. Imagine if all we do.
02:17:39 For a couple of generations.
02:17:43 It is instant death penalty for all murderers.
02:17:47 So they're they're just gone. They're not only are they out of the gene pool, you are no longer having to spend resources of people who aren't murderers on people that are murderers. By keeping them alive in a prison.
02:18:00 Somewhere. So you execute all murderers, all murderers.
02:18:04 All in all, all like extreme violence, like any hyper violent crime, you know, like a super violent rapist or or even like a a violent mugger, you know, any, any hyper violent crime, you just execute them outright.
02:18:21 And then you start sterilizing and you want, like you know, as a society you you decide where to draw the line. You know, maybe you decide to sterilize.
02:18:33 Anyone who is that steals a car and maybe that's like the that's the minimum you can get away with before you sterilize, but let's just say you you just start sterilizing criminals in mass, executing criminals in mass.
02:18:51 Well, at the same time removing all of these financial burdens that you have placed on the people who are good so that you can pay for the people.
02:19:00 That are bad.
02:19:03 After like just five generations, it wouldn't be a utopia, but it'd be way fucking closer to a utopia than it is today.
02:19:11 And and that's the kind of thing that.
02:19:14 People are uncomfortable talking about and be honest, I would say the reason why that is so.
02:19:20 No.
02:19:21 Is partially because of Christianity's focus on the dregs of society. This focus on the prodigal son, this focus on well Jesus used to hang out with prostitutes and and shitty people. And this focus on all and on basically that that we all have the same value when.
02:19:40 We we kind of don't.
02:19:43 And and and that that is the the big difference that Beyondism has in this respect from Christianity that I think that maybe is is worth considering is that we we all don't have the same value and if if we can recognize and accept the fact that we all don't have the same value.
02:20:03 Then all of a sudden it's not a, a, a big humanitarian issue. If you want to start sterilizing people and executing.
02:20:13 All of a sudden that this idea of just innate human rights goes out the window because instead of having some oh, we're we're all we have these God-given, you know, human rights just by virtue of existing we are we all have the same value and worth when we really don't. If the aim of your society.
02:20:33 Is the improvement in survival and thriving of your race and your people? Then you don't all have the same value.
02:20:40 In fact, there's there's some people that, given the right calculations, you could make the argument are are having a negative.
02:20:48 Effect on on your racist survival and your your racist ability to thrive, and this kind of thinking. Like I said, this this wasn't that taboo in 20th century America until all the anti Hitler propaganda of World War 2. Hitler was hugely influenced by.
02:21:09 The eugenicists of America, and in fact used many of the templates created by American eugenicists to implement the policies that he was implementing in German.
02:21:22 And and this is the kind of.
02:21:25 Racial hygiene, which is one way they used to put it.
02:21:31 That has been completely thrown in the trash because of the post World War 2 narrative of you know it. It leaves the genocide when it doesn't. By the way, it it even in the extreme position will be considered extreme by a lot of people that I have that you should just basically execute all murderers.
02:21:51 How is that? I mean, sorry, I'm I just don't. I don't feel like I need to even defend that. I don't think that's an indefensible position that we should.
02:21:57 Execute.
02:21:57 All murderers, or that we should sterilize retarded people. Why? Why do you feel like it's so? It's such a a horrible thing to prevent retarded people from having children.
02:22:11 What's the argument for retarded people get to have kids?
02:22:21 You know, I I don't understand. Like what? What exactly are we missing out on by preventing retarded people from having kids?
02:22:34 And look, you gave, you gave a work out a compromise and say like, look if if you're retarded and you don't want to be sterilized you can always leave.
02:22:47 We will, we will deport you to some other country that likes having retards going around having babies.
02:23:02 So this is, this is another thing that that Beyondism really I think.
02:23:10 Articulates in a way that articulates a problem with at least the way Christianity is applied in the West, right?
02:23:18 Where it it it this whole concept of, well, we're all of equal worth because we're all God's children. Beyondism would say, well, we're not actually all God's children, first of all. And second of all.
02:23:32 We're all. We're also not of equal worth. We all don't contribute to the goal that we have as a society in equal amounts, and so therefore we're not equal in our value. And so therefore we can also make judgment calls based on this calculus and decide that some of us need to go.
02:23:55 And that's a difficult problem for a Christian to address.
02:24:03 Simply because there is this focus on even like the worst you know, people like these, you know, like the, the, the thieves and the beggars and the prostitutes, you know, Jesus loved them too. And that is.
02:24:18 In my opinion, an exploit that is something that's easily exploited.
02:24:23 And and turned into and turned. Well. Turned against us as a people.
02:24:30 Where it does prevent people from.
02:24:35 Really facing the reality that we're not all equal.
02:24:40 That we're all we're not all of equal value.
02:24:43 That we all shouldn't be reproducing.
02:24:46 That we all shouldn't have.
02:24:49 Be treated as if we all have the same.
02:24:54 Worth.
02:24:55 Because we don't.
02:24:58 And so that's one thing that that.
02:25:02 The Beyondism really kind of.
02:25:06 There's a big departure between how a lot of a lot of people in the West think.
02:25:11 And.
02:25:12 And.
02:25:14 And I guess make at least creates A rationale for dealing with some of these problems that are otherwise difficult to deal with. If you if you deal with them.
02:25:24 Through the lens of Christianity.
02:25:32 I guess a another aspect of of Beyondism.
02:25:36 Is that?
02:25:44 Another another I guess.
02:25:46 And this isn't just Christianity, this is also just.
02:25:52 Freudian A Freudian worldview that this idea of human rights.
02:25:58 And this is more expanding what we just talked about the idea of human rights is this universal thing. It's not just Christianity that that sort of teaches this. It's also this, the 40 in psychology that talks about the.
02:26:13 Which is the, you know this the the IT is the the 40 in term that that describes the the internal drives.
02:26:22 That are constantly demanding individual entitlements like freedom and equality.
02:26:31 And at the expense of and.
02:26:37 Or often and and always and and always in.
02:26:42 Well, they're not always in opposition to, but usually in opposition to your responsibilities to your group. Whereas Beyondism, because it focuses on what's good for the group and what's good for the race and what's good for the long term evolution of your people, it rejects the idea that you should take into account.
02:27:03 This idea of the Ed that, that, that that you should have these individualist entitlements up to and including freedom and certainly equality.
02:27:16 And that you shouldn't have these universal, you know rights and value, and it's simply because you have this, this, you know.
02:27:29 This Freudian individualism and that that that rights should be a two way St. it should be more of a contractual situation based on the idea that the conditions are that what you you know the the freedom that you have is within the constraint.
02:27:48 Things of what you are allowed to do should be constrained by what is good for the survival of the people, for group survival and the improvement of your people.
02:27:59 And it should only exist as as a agreement with the with your group that what you are allowed to do is is is within a.
02:28:12 A condition of of maintaining group stability and improvement, and that everyone should have duties because of this focus on the long term evolution and progression of your of your race and of your people, that you should therefore be have not just should you be deprived of freedoms that would go in.
02:28:34 Have you know conflicts with this?
02:28:36 But you should actually have expectations.
02:28:39 That you know, it shouldn't, that it's not enough to just deprive you of freedoms that would conflict with the the.
02:28:49 The Evolution evolutionary improvement of your people, but you should actually be expected.
02:28:56 To contribute to the evolution of your people and that that should be the culture of of a successful people, that's the sort of thing, not this embracing of individualism, this embracing of freedom, but rather it should be an embrace of the.
02:29:16 The survival and thriving of your of your race and of your of your group.
02:29:25 And so this is the sort of thing that would obviously address a lot of the problems that people complain about today. The this, this, I should have the freedom to be a tranny. I should be have the freedom to be a faggot. I should.
02:29:40 Have the freedom.
02:29:41 To you know, I'm just being me. I should be able to be a furry.
02:29:45 You know all this mental illness that we see in this hyper individualist society that that, that's.
02:29:52 This.
02:29:54 I guess late stage individualism in the West.
02:29:57 Would be addressed because none of this stuff would be permitted in a beyond just society, because beyond just would say, well, not only should you not have the freedom to do this, you should maybe maybe be stare at the at the least sterilized and at at most executed because what you are doing.
02:30:18 Is actually endangering the genetic fitness of our people as a group and having you out there in the gene pool is dangerous.
02:30:30 Because you are clearly a a a bad mutation or an expression of of bad mutations and so allowing you to exist in the gene pool is.
02:30:42 Is dangerous.
02:30:48 Then the another aspect is is.
02:30:55 Let's see here.
02:31:02 OK, I guess he he kind of talks about how as much as every group should be separate and every group should have its own ethics and every group should have its own, you know, genetic separation.
02:31:19 And that you know.
02:31:20 Theological separation from from the other groups. There should be some sort of coordination between the groups to avoid situations where when you have the interests of two different groups conflict with each other that there are peaceful ways of of resolving that.
02:31:40 To at least try to avoid situations where you get into, you know, genocidal war warfare, where the competition between groups becomes so.
02:31:50 So, so competitive that that one group just decides to destroy another group because that's what's an interest in the interest of their survival. Now, that said, the door is left open to it's not, you know, Beyondism does not.
02:32:07 Say that that the destruction of other groups and the interest of your existence is outside of the realm of, you know what would be allowed under Beyondism, Beyondism, would still say that under under certain circumstances.
02:32:23 If no other solution, no peaceful solution can be found and the.
02:32:29 You know that that is really the the only way you can you can resolve an issue. You would be able. You would be permitted under those circumstances to violently seek to.
02:32:41 Destroy another group that got into the way of in the way of your of your group survival. But there should at the same time be some sort of of coordination, some sort of federation between the the groups and that that governs the interactions between the group.
02:32:58 And and and looks and and seeks to find your relationships between the groups that maintain separation while at the same time having some level of cooperation. Just you know whether it's economic trade and you know, technological exchange and cultural exchange.
02:33:19 Because ultimately, Beyondism would say it's it's not, it's not in favor of one particular group. It's in favor of humanity. And so the whole point of having this separation isn't because they're.
02:33:32 Seeking to protect one group, you know, like white people as an example, but rather.
02:33:37 They're seeking to protect humanity as a whole, and so having some kind of federation that that, that governs the interaction between the groups is there to facilitate that separation.
02:33:52 Let's see here.
02:33:55 A lot of this we already covered.
02:33:57 A lot of.
02:34:00 A lot of the sound let's.
02:34:01 See here.
02:34:04 Just more more emphasis on you genics.
02:34:08 Creating barriers to dysgenic practices, you know, for example. So we already kind of talked about this opposition to policies that that favor reproduction of less adaptive traits.
02:34:23 And and and and not only that, but they should be. You should proactively seek to increase the reproduction of people with adaptive traits.
02:34:38 Let's see here.
02:34:41 01 another view that that be honest would have. I mean, if they existed, they.
02:34:46 Don't exist.
02:34:48 Is that that this evolution of people?
02:34:52 And this progress of races should be encouraged up to and including a A a divergent from each other so extreme that we become not just different subspecies which many be honest, would already view the different races as but.
02:35:11 Literally different species altogether that that, that, that kind of divergences would be, would be completely preferable to to not having that kind of diversity, because that just increases the diversity and because of the beyond, just view that there's nothing special about humans that they don't view that as bad in any way that like, oh, like now there's.
02:35:30 Now there's these humans that swim underwater and have gills, and you know that, wouldn't that wouldn't.
02:35:36 Them out, they would.
02:35:36 Think that would be cool.
02:35:40 Another you know, just focus on research on this stuff and blah blah.
02:35:46 So that that's.
02:35:48 That's pretty much beyond is in a in a nutshell. And I would say really.
02:35:55 More than anything else.
02:35:58 More than anything else.
02:36:00 The biggest obstacle to anything even kind of like this.
02:36:06 Ever being implemented in human societies is that it is so focused on.
02:36:13 The promotion of.
02:36:16 The exceptional among your society.
02:36:19 And favoring the exceptional in your society.
02:36:25 And.
02:36:27 And really, the disenfranchisement of the unexceptional in your society.
02:36:34 That it lacks practicality simply because of that very reason, meaning that.
02:36:41 The majority of your people are not exceptional.
02:36:46 I mean, that's what makes someone who's exceptional. Exceptional is they're the exception to the rule.
02:36:52 And so the idea that you would ever be able to get the majority of the people to sign on to an an, an ideology that would favor not them.
02:37:06 And in some instances, punish them, or at least a good chunk of them.
02:37:13 You would never be able to get people to sign on to them.
02:37:17 The only way it's just it's it's like communism, right, like, oh, if we were all robots and and just and didn't have human nature, then maybe it would. It would be, you know, it'd be appealing, would work the same sort of thing if if humans.
02:37:31 Had a natural inclination towards this way of thinking. First of all, you wouldn't need Beyondism, because we'd already think like this, we would already think in terms of what's best for the genetic future of our people. Well, we don't.
02:37:42 That's not how people think. And so you would never, you would never be able to implement anything even remotely like this, because most people are not exceptional. So most people are going to want to or are going to gravitate more towards an ideology that's going to benefit them because most people are self interested and it doesn't matter that.
02:38:03 You know, in some ways you can make the argument that, Beyondism would long term on a long enough timeline of positively affect their their genetic line. That's not how people think. That's not how how people think at all. So unfortunately, you know well.
02:38:23 More fortunately, depending on how you look at it, nothing like this would ever be able to be implemented, but it doesn't mean that we can't look at some of this stuff.
02:38:31 And think of ways that you could incorporate it into something that might be more plausible, but this is that's basically, that's basically what Beyondism was. And that's basically, in my opinion, the the big, you know, sticking point is you would never be able to get it to work because most people would not benefit.
02:38:50 Most people.
02:38:51 Benefit in elite hue and in fact culturally that like, that's how eugenicists are viewed and demonized, right. And and people like well, and people like Hitler, that's how that he is viewed and demonized as like oh, they want to get rid of all the bad people. Which means you, if you've got brown eyes or you know.
02:39:11 Or brown hair. And so it it's unfortunately that you would never be able to get anything remotely resembling this even sort of going.
02:39:24 Which is why there's, you know, like it doesn't exist. There's no, there's no.
02:39:29 You know, be honest organization or or or members, but I think there is there's still some positive things that we could we could think of and and positive takes and and viewpoints. You know the idea of of cultural cultural output also being technological output. I think that's like a.
02:39:47 A A way, a way that especially because white people I feel are more.
02:39:55 Tend more towards the technological output than and and focus on on more. That's where they put a lot of their creative energy into the technological output, more so than the, you know, writing poetry and shit like that. And and I think that, you know, having this idea that or having a a rational way of viewing.
02:40:16 Why universalism of ethics is is dead on arrival, and why there's issues with that is something to think about for a lot of people anyway.
02:40:26 I thought it was an interesting thing to discuss to talk about, sorry if it was super dry and boring. I know it. I don't have any like video clips or whatever to go along with it. There was a there was a interview that was with Kittel talking about intelligence and race and intelligence.
02:40:47 But even just like, the only place I found it wanted me to pay $200 just to watch it, or they'd send me a DVD for $250 and I was.
02:40:57 Like, no, fuck that.
02:41:01 Yeah, I'll, I'll pass. But look, if you want to look into it further, he wrote extensively about it. It's very dense, very dense, but it's very available. You can find all the the the writings on this.
02:41:18 On archive.org.
02:41:21 Not again, not. It didn't really take off. It didn't really go anywhere, but it has some it has some interesting points and it it offers some.
02:41:30 You know, not very plausible, but at least interesting solutions. And that's something you don't often see when you when you have people who are quick to criticize, you know, Christianity. And in some Nietzschean way they they very it's not very often they have an alternative.
02:41:49 And while this is a very.
02:41:51 Unlikely alternative. At least it's an alternative. At least it is it's coherent. It's at least it's rational, right? And it has it. It it it's it's something that maybe, you know, you could build off of or or borrow from or or whatever. And it's not. It's not just complete.
02:42:12 Psycho, you know, schizophrenic ramblings. It's from a highly intelligent, somewhat autistic.
02:42:20 Eugenicist.
02:42:22 So anyway, let's take a look at with that, I guess let's take a look at.
02:42:28 How long have I been live?
02:42:30 That's yeah, it was a long, long time. It was like 2 1/2 hours. I mean, monologuing about Beyondism.
02:42:40 That's longer than I thought I'd be able.
02:42:41 To do it. Uh, you know.
02:42:46 Let's take a look at it's hyper chats here. So we're going over to entropy first.
02:42:53 Or entropy. We got Mr. Nags with a big dono.
02:42:59 Hold on. I got to make.
02:43:00 Sure, I got the.
02:43:04 Have the buttons. I still haven't fixed all my buttons here we.
02:43:06 Go. Oh, that's loud.
02:43:07 Money is power. Money is the only weapon that you have to defend yourself with.
02:43:11 Look, look, look, look.
02:43:12 Look how Jewy this fag is.
02:43:30 All right. And we've got, Mr. Negs says, have you ever looked into Mark Rich? I read his biography before being Jay Pill. Looking back there probably more to the story, isn't he? That he's like a Jewish billionaire, Mossad agent guy, right. I'm trying to, I actually.
02:43:49 Yeah, some title like Seth Rich or something like that cause I I.
02:43:54 Like it's almost been 10 years now, but like almost 10 years ago, I did a video talking about Mark Rich and his involvement with something. No, something to do with the WikiLeaks emails.
02:44:06 Let me see if it pops up.
02:44:09 Mark Rich, he was uh.
02:44:13 There's like some billionaire, some Jewish billionaire.
02:44:20 Mark, Rich, WikiLeaks. I forget how he was involved with WikiLeaks.
02:44:38 Let's see here.
02:44:41 Yeah, I I'd have.
02:44:42 To I mean, you have to be more specific. I'd have to look into it more. I just remember he he was mentioning something in some video I did back in 2016. I don't remember what the, what the tie in was, but it had something to do with with WikiLeaks.
02:44:59 Yeah, I guess that could be a topic I'll, I'll copy that into my my notes.
02:45:07 Mark rich.
02:45:12 OK.
02:45:15 Ah, let's see here. Thank you. Mr. Nags, we got Gorilla hands.
02:45:32 Gorilla hand says.
02:45:35 I have been listening to you since your YouTube days back in 2018. I was listening to the first stream you did back in 2019 on my way home from work. It's almost like going back in time. You are right on about a Black Swan event. COVID George Floyd riots in 2020 election. However, you still didn't want to name them.
02:45:58 Back in 2019.
02:46:00 Maybe I I'm a little more. I guess it depends on what platform I was on, because I did do a stream or two on YouTube and so it might have had something to do with it there. There was like a short, there was a brief period when I was.
02:46:14 Trying to figure out how to do that, how to talk about Jews and still not and not be silenced forever. You know what I mean? And. And then as as alternative platforms started to pop up.
02:46:27 They made it more.
02:46:29 And it made it easy. Easier to make that. But yeah, I guess I'd be. I haven't even. I haven't even listened to my old ones. I guess that'd be weird to go back and listen to some of my old.
02:46:39 But yeah, it's been doing. Been doing this a long time now, been doing this a long time.
02:46:46 But appreciate that, Mister Mr. Gorilla hands.
02:46:50 And then Mr. Gorilla hand simply says, can I get a? I don't know if I added the.
02:46:55 Button.
02:46:56 For this yet.
02:47:00 This might be one of the buttons. I still don't have.
02:47:04 Wait here, we.
02:47:05 Go.
02:47:05 Half $1,000,000.
02:47:10 All right. And then Mr. Gorilla hands also says Fagots.
02:47:16 And then we got Mark, ESB says you mentioned in the last few strings, but it needs reiterating. AI is turning people into NPCS.
02:47:27 Quote I asked AI End Quote is becoming the new I read on Wikipedia anything controversial can't be trusted. Well, it's not anything controversial, it's it's anything can't be trusted. Wikipedia is actually way more accurate than AI.
02:47:45 And because at least with Wikipedia, hey, there's a mechanism to challenge it. There's sources that have to be cited. AI is is. It's almost like.
02:47:57 It's like.
02:47:59 I mean, part of its training data is Wikipedia, but it's.
02:48:03 OK.
02:48:03 Yeah, I would say Wikipedia is way more accurate than than AI and.
02:48:11 AI is is just wrong. A lot like a lot about a lot of things and sometimes just makes things up entirely. And yeah, it's going to make people stupid.
02:48:22 It's already well, it's already making people stupid, wandering full.
02:48:31 On the FedEx.
02:48:33 Wandering Fool says I have a question for your younger viewers about AI. How much of your generation believes it to be?
02:48:40 True.
02:48:41 In my conversations with students, I have been told that a considerable amount of them take what they or what their preferred AI says as gospel.
02:48:51 The Internet doesn't lie was a meme not long ago. I wonder how much longer that will be the case. The reason I ask is because of an article in the Guardian called the new, historically accurate digital. Oh wait, the called new, historically accurate.
02:49:13 Oh wait, that's a long title. OK, it's called new historically accurate digital replica will allow films to be set within Auschwitz. It brings up a point that Devon made previously about AI being used to sell a certain story. The article says, quote, a second phase of the project.
02:49:33 Will involve 3D scanning as well as a building historically accurate or building historically accurate digital replicas of the crematoriums. The gas chambers that were destroyed by the Nazis in late 1944. If what I have been told by those students is true, we could be quickly approaching a point of no return.
02:49:55 I also want to follow up. Alright, well, all dressed up first. Yeah. No, absolutely. That's going to be The thing is, most people will just accept whatever AI says, especially as.
02:50:07 The historical record is indistinguishable from AI, so it's already at a point where historic footage is easy to fake. I mean, it's easy to fake, and there might be some giveaways now, and some telltale signs, but you can see already happening people posting.
02:50:27 Bullshit. Obviously to us AI photos.
02:50:32 On on Twitter and getting, you know, billions of retweets from idiots that think it's like a real photo that's that's already. And that's just now, there will come a point where it's pretty much impossible that just doing distinguish whether or not the recording you're listening to is a actual recording of someone talking in 1945.
02:50:53 Versus an AI generated recording of someone is, how would you tell the difference once the technology gets to a certain level? How are you?
02:51:00 Going to tell the difference.
02:51:02 And you know, beyond maybe being some kind of forensic expert in the field and even then it might get almost impossible to tell the difference, right?
02:51:10 So yeah, it's going to be really hard when.
02:51:13 When?
02:51:14 Anyone can rewrite history and not only just rewrite history, they'll be able to have you experience it in some virtual way. They they can tell you. Not only did Auschwitz look like this, I'm going to put you in virtual Auschwitz.
02:51:30 And they'll put you in virtual Auschwitz and the technology is getting good enough to where it will be immersive and it'll leave like you'll you'll have people that get PTSD from from visiting fake Auschwitz.
02:51:44 And that will leave a mark, and that's what they want. I mean, of course that obviously that's what I'd want, if that if my whole worldview depended on getting people to believe in the Holocaust, I'd want to put them through a virtual Holocaust and give them as much PTSD as possible and mindfuck them. And they're going to do that.
02:52:04 They will absolutely do that.
02:52:07 And that's another reason why we can't be these people that just regress and ignore the technological reality and and just, you know, try to live in some, you know, place with a dirt floor churning butter, you know, in the corner we have to we have to stay up to date with technology.
02:52:27 And and in fact, we have to not just stay up to date, we should be leading the innovation in technology.
02:52:35 So that's that's.
02:52:39 Or at the very least, reaching the people that are, you know, like if if you yourself aren't going to be the one leading technology, we should be leading a movement that involves the people that are and you should be raising children who are at least intellectually able and motivated to like, you shouldn't be raising.
02:52:59 Like, I think that one of the problems that that the right gets into is they it's kind of what I was talking about the very, very beginning of the stream where in response to.
02:53:09 The term progressive and how everyone now sees that as a progress is like a dirty word, and so they almost want to regress and go back to some weird, simpler time before computers. And I get that, and maybe on some level there that's appropriate, but you don't you don't want to raise people who are.
02:53:29 Or, you know, technologically illiterate or there will be slaves to.
02:53:33 This machine.
02:53:35 And so that's I think that that's the the tight rope that is going to be difficult but necessary for us to walk is that you want to protect your children from the I guess that's the the genetic lag, right, is that we're that we're trying to deal with the genetic lag and and Beyondism terms.
02:53:54 Is that we got this new technology that offers all this evil and and and and horrible.
02:54:01 But it also has all this good attached to it.
02:54:05 And not everyone's going to be genetically fit to deal with that. And those people are going to suffer. And it's not because of anything wrong with them. There's no way their genes could have anticipated the mutation. That is the Inter Internet. The because all these innovations, This is why I like, Beyondisms, there aren't. There are things that it makes it easy to articulate.
02:54:26 Certain things there are aspects of Beyondism that are that are worthwhile, and this is one of those.
02:54:31 Things.
02:54:32 Where that is it precisely described. It precisely describes the situation that we are in in terms of.
02:54:39 A lot of people with traditional values and and and things that are worth preserving, having to somehow deal with the the the introduction of the this, this.
02:54:55 Technology that again you could describe as a mutation and and and being genetically ill equipped to handle.
02:55:02 It.
02:55:03 Or at the very least, having. Maybe you're not genetically ill equipped, but maybe the transition between a life before this mutation was there and a life after is is.
02:55:15 It's an. It's a difficult.
02:55:16 Colt selection pressure that's being applied.
02:55:21 And so I think that's that's.
02:55:25 I think it it that's going to be the big question is in terms of if whether or not we're able to weather this storm is that's going to be a big part of that is whether or not we're going to be able to technologically intellectually keep up with some of these disruptive technologies.
02:55:45 Let's see here. Well, thank you very much. Wandering fool video Grams says ChatGPT is definitely better than Grok AA said Grok is like a Marxist professor. I concur that ChatGPT is more reasonable and honest if you are careful with wording, Grok will always force in globalhomo.
02:56:06 I I use all of them. I I use. I even use gabs AI cause surprisingly gabs been better in some areas. Deep sea has been better in other areas, rock is better than other areas.
02:56:21 It and it doesn't even matter whether or not I'm I'm, I'm researching a topic like Beyondism or whether I'm having it help me write a a Python script which I do. I have to pass that script between different API's in order for it to accomplish what I want.
02:56:42 Sometimes, like I'll have ChatGPT in something that again, it should just be.
02:56:48 You know, it's it's this is the one area where where AI is supposed to shine right, and be able to generate code because it's not like it's it's not, it's not subjective.
02:56:58 And so I've had ChatGPT say well, what you're trying to accomplish is impossible. And then I upload the exact same code to grock and say the exact same prompt and it's like, oh, here you go. I've I've updated the script to add that functionality. And you're like, oh, well, right. And then.
02:57:17 And then and then and then Grock will hit.
02:57:20 A brick wall.
02:57:21 And then you get the exact same script and go back to ChatGPT and you're like, hey, you know, thing you said it was impossible. Why I was able to get that fixed. But now we got this problem and sometimes it's like, oh, well, I can fix this thing that that just that Grok just said was impossible.
02:57:35 Now sometimes it becomes a big fucking mess, but I've I've been able to get.
02:57:41 Get a lot like lot more lot coating that was way above my pay grade accomplished by doing this sort of a thing.
02:57:48 Ah man of low moral fiber says you could do an entire stream about the negro ineptitude that resulted in 10 violent New Orleans nogs escaping the resulting press conference, they were blamed.
02:58:01 Whitey for building a soft jail.
02:58:06 I don't know you're talking about.
02:58:11 That I missed something, I I maybe I missed something. I don't. I have no idea.
02:58:14 What that's in?
02:58:15 Reference to brown trot. Burglar says long time first time you know how it goes. Going to catch the replay now that AI is getting really good, why not try seeing if you can make shirts to commemorate your really big streams?
02:58:32 Just an idea now back to raising my blonde hair. Blue eyed family. Well, I appreciate that. And yeah, I gotta get.
02:58:38 Some.
02:58:38 New get some new merch ready in the store.
02:58:43 As soon as I get a free moment, I was I was beekeeping all well, most of today.
02:58:48 And doing various other last minute outdoor things I'm trying to get done before the heat hits.
02:58:55 Jay Orlando says good evening Dev love the intro. My hens are well hatched. 80 blue egg layers. Very few casualties. Predators had a line on some bees but not red.
02:59:09 Me. Plus man, I have neighbors. You be cool. Have a good one. You can have neighbors and bees well apparent where you live. If you live somewhere where there's not Africanized bees.
02:59:21 Then you can have bees all the time. Bees are not going to bother neighbors.
02:59:28 OK.
02:59:28 You know, even if they get close to the hive, the.
02:59:31 You know.
02:59:32 Non Africanized bees are pretty chill. You can. I mean, you can open up the in fact, the one hive I have where I actually have two that aren't Africanized today. I I was fully suited up because I was opening the other hives too. They didn't, they didn't. They acted like I wasn't even there. Like I opened up the top.
02:59:51 And they just kept B&B's I had I not been wearing anything and I had. I not used any smoke. It wouldn't matter. They would have been totally fine.
03:00:00 And unfortunately, that's just not the case with most.
03:00:02 Of my hives.
03:00:02 Anymore, Adam says things. Do you think you can get some hemp honey going? No, that's actually a lie. When people act like they've got. Well, first of all, I wouldn't make.
03:00:16 I wouldn't make any THC honey anyway, but like the THC honey that they they they talk about with like ohh look we used bees to make honey out of out of marijuana flowers that it doesn't work that way. It doesn't work that way because the the bees aren't attracted to.
03:00:36 The female plan.
03:00:40 The because that the the the the pollen is on the mail plan. So they're getting the nectar and pollen from the male plant and that doesn't have any THC in it. So when you see these advertisements like, oh, THC honeybee, they're lying to you. They're just putting, they're just squirting.
03:00:58 PHC and honey is what they're.
03:00:59 Doing.
03:01:00 But as far as hemp, honey like actual just the mail plant, I mean, I don't know, I'd have to grow. You have to grow a lot of hemp to get honey from it. And so I would need like acres of hemp.
03:01:15 Because if I just grew like 10 hemp plants in my backyard, you know, like the male hemp.
03:01:19 Plants.
03:01:21 You know, there's, they're they're. They're collecting nectar and honey or nectar and pollen from every other plant in the in, you know, in the vicinity. So I guess it would it to some degree it would be hemp, but you know it would be.
03:01:34 You have to basically have it if you want it. You want it to be a monoculture. Honey, you have to have enough of that plant to sustain the entire hive.
03:01:44 Hammer Thorazine says. I may have. I may not have heard you mention it, but if you're not aware of Kanye's new album title, look it up. It'll explain everything.
03:01:59 What's the new album?
03:02:00 Title.
03:02:18 It's literally called cuck.
03:02:29 Yeah. There you go. There you go.
03:02:32 Yeah, but super based, right, super based and red pilled.
03:02:37 Ah boy, I was not aware of that. No, there you go.
03:02:42 Imagine. Imagine that. Imagine that. Imagine that.
03:02:47 You don't. You just don't get it, Devon. You just don't. Really.
03:02:52 I don't get it. I don't get you're promoting a album to White kids, a black man who sucked off his nine year old cousin for years.
03:03:02 Actually didn't stop until the cousin was nine, which implies he started when he was much younger.
03:03:08 And and I don't get that he's promoting an album called cuck. Yeah, OK.
03:03:16 Oh.
03:03:18 It must be some kind of weird irony thing, right?
03:03:22 Very good. Ryan Higgins with a big dono.
03:03:25 Money is power. Money is the only weapon that the Jew has to defend himself with.
03:03:30 Look how jewy this fag is.
03:03:47 All right, Ryan Higgins says. Why is there such a reluctance among Jay Pilled whites to discard current theological belief systems that are easily corruptible and have led us to this modern reality? Christianity and paganism included. Why not discard everything and move forward based on upon a core set of principles?
03:04:07 And virtues, then let the metaphysical system develop organically from this spiritual core. Well, I first I don't even know that that's necessary, but I'd say if if that's what you set out to do.
03:04:20 It's a lot easier said than done the, the the metaphor I've used in the past, I think works and addresses what you're talking about. If what you wanted to do is discard.
03:04:33 What you saw is outdated religious theology and updated to something that's a little more.
03:04:40 Or white or or or more ethnocentric. Or really more.
03:04:47 The the problem that you're going to run into is the same problem that you would run into if you had a vast multinational corporation that, let's say, adopted some warehouse software back in the 1990s. And over the years they've been updating it and patching it to go from, you know.
03:05:06 DOS to you know, whatever operating system they're using now and and it's undergone a lot of these updates to accommodate the new hardware and the new shipping.
03:05:17 And and interfacing with new clients and stuff, but ultimately it's still the software that was written in the 1990s. And so therefore it has a lot of issues with it, a lot of exploits that need to be patched and a lot of it's it's kind of clunky, the interface kind of sucks or whatever, it's not optimal.
03:05:39 And if you were to just throw it out the window and and write a new piece of software from scratch.
03:05:44 Match and deploy that. That would make everything just run smoother. You could even maybe calculate the your company could save maybe millions of dollars every year just by switching to this new software. You would plug all these vulnerability holes, you know, whatever.
03:05:59 It that's again and it will tell you that works in in any kind of environment like this.
03:06:07 It's that not. Not that that's incorrect. That. Yeah. Maybe you could. Maybe you could write this new program that would do this and address all these problems or whatever.
03:06:16 But it's easier said than done, because now you have to upgrade maybe a ton of hardware. You're going to inevitably come up with encounter new problems, new exploits are going to be found with this new hardware, you have to retrain everybody that works in your company that's been using this software for 30 years. You're going to have.
03:06:37 Issues just regular compatibility issues.
03:06:41 It's a huge undertaking to try to tell people that, hey, you know this theology that as a people that you have practiced for over 1000 years, yeah, we're gonna just throw it out the window and and use this other one because it's better. First of all, good luck selling that to to people. And and second of all.
03:07:01 Good luck developing something that's going to.
03:07:06 Be able to be capable of replacing it in any kind of meaningful way, or it's going to be attractive it and who knows, maybe something maybe a new religious revival will take place in the same way Christianity took, you know, took on or took hold in Europe. Maybe something else will.
03:07:25 Will catch on or or be or rather much like Christianity was was kind of top down implemented. Maybe something like that. I I don't know, but it's easier said than done and you're you're also dealing with as someone that was raised in a very religious family.
03:07:42 And I even when I wasn't practicing Mormonism and I was out partying and drinking and smoking pot and and whatever and breaking all the rules.
03:07:51 I still believed it. I still believe that. Well, I'm just, you know, I'm selling my wild oats. I will eventually go back and and, you know, go to church and and have a Mormon family and all that. And I'm just succumbing to temptation and, you know, eventually I'll come. I'll. I'll come back to it.
03:08:09 I thought in that context for a really long time it took me a long time for me to discard.
03:08:19 Or or not discar cause it's always gonna be a part of my my family history and part of.
03:08:23 MyHeritage.
03:08:24 But to disconnect.
03:08:27 From.
03:08:29 Viewing Mormonism as like.
03:08:33 Scientifically true. You know, if that makes any sense like.
03:08:37 It is not thinking of it as as as.
03:08:42 Part of the the the narrative of reality, you know, and because it's.
03:08:49 It's it's just tough, like it's tough to.
03:08:54 And I'd like to think that I'm I'm pretty.
03:08:55 Good at at.
03:08:57 And shifting and making you know I I feel like I'm I'm smart enough and open minded enough to use a term to to readjust my belief system when necessary and probably more so than the average person.
03:09:14 And it was still really difficult for.
03:09:16 Me to to.
03:09:17 To just say I don't know if this this checks out.
03:09:21 Like just for me to do that.
03:09:22 Just for me to go from like.
03:09:24 You know, being raised, this is the truth. And you know this is.
03:09:30 You know, this is the way it is to going and maybe it's not the way it is, even just to make that step it was it was a tough step to make.
03:09:39 So you'd be up against that and.
03:09:43 And look there.
03:09:44 No one. I'm not. At least I'm not. I'm certainly not saying that Christianity is is the source of all the problems of white people, or that even that it's necessary to bypass or discard in order to.
03:09:58 To succeed as a people, but there are certain there are certainly some very real problems with with.
03:10:09 With our current situation and the the role, at least that Christianity is playing currently in the context of of decline of the West and and in white genocide it it.
03:10:23 There is a.
03:10:25 There's an issue with Christianity that is that is not adequately being addressed.
03:10:33 In any kind of significant way that I see.
03:10:37 Next, so yeah, it is. There are problems that need to be addressed.
03:10:43 And I don't see them being addressed. And in fact, I see that I see a lot of people.
03:10:53 Coping, you know and and and.
03:10:56 And and ignoring some of the the gaping holes and problems with it. But.
03:11:02 That said, you know it is what it is. I'm. I know. I'm not trying to be a fence sitter. It's just like I'm genuinely agnostic on the topic. I was raised. Like I said, Mormon and and and I it, it was a big step for me to be like this.
03:11:15 Is probably not it.
03:11:18 You know, and I've yet to go from that to, but this is it, you know, like I'm. I'm still in that zone of. Nah, this is.
03:11:24 Probably not it.
03:11:28 You know it's it's tough. It just goes to show it is tough. It's tough to make any kind of.
03:11:33 Change like that and maybe you know, just like it it did take for Christianity to be implemented. Maybe it does take like a top down kind of a thing, you know, like some kind of enforced.
03:11:48 You know, and, you know, enacted from some, you know, dictator like maybe some dictator have to say this is the new religion. Now for it to to have for that change to take, I don't know.
03:12:00 But it's just it's it's not not the easiest thing to do. It's not like just. It's not like changing soda brand. It's not like going from Coke to Pepsi. And look how hard it is for people to do that.
03:12:11 Now there's die hard fucking Coke fans that I hate Pepsi. It's like it's basically the same shit, dude, but they can't do it.
03:12:18 You know, there's people that people have brand loyalty to Christianity that just that just that psychological aspect of.
03:12:25 It.
03:12:25 Is hard to overcome if that's your mission, and then I'm not even saying again, that's.
03:12:29 Not.
03:12:31 That's not my my mission. I don't know that that's necessary. I'm just saying that if that's what you wanted to do, you would have a lot of obstacles. It would not be. It would not be the.
03:12:41 Easiest thing.
03:12:44 Reese Schneider says not to oversimplify it, but race first. Everything is downstream of race, which is determined by genetics, God and nature.
03:12:54 Yeah. Well, like I said, the thing that I that I appreciate about Beyondism is that it prioritizes the success of your, you know, he doesn't term it race, but basically basically.
03:13:07 It's implied by.
03:13:10 By saying that that your group, you know your race and and I I appreciate that that is the motivation and I appreciate the attempt at making a coherent theology that that puts that forth as the the driving factor. And I do think it's coherent. I just don't think it's.
03:13:32 Realistic, you know, but I I do appreciate the attempt to put forth a rational, coherent theology that is race based. And look, there's other race. There's plenty of race based theologies that have come and gone and and obviously Judaism has has has seems to have staying power.
03:13:52 And that seems to have been very successful for them. And I do think that at times Christians, European Christians.
03:14:04 And you can see it in their writing. When you see early Christians, like, even early American writings where they talk about, oh, and he was a Christian, they mean white. That's what they mean when you'll hear, you know, like an early settler. Talk about, oh, this man was Christian. And this guy was was Indian.
03:14:24 They're clearly they clearly mean white, you know. And there was a time when Christian was synonymous with white. But the way that Christianity is applied today is, is is it's universalist. It's which is incompatible with having a, a theology that is in the.
03:14:44 Interest of your own people.
03:14:47 And prioritizes your people above other people, and that's that's.
03:14:54 That's just a reality, and there's no major Christian denomination.
03:15:00 That that deviates from that, they are all universalists in that respect.
03:15:07 And that's that's a problem. It's a problem. It's a problem for me, and it's probably a problem for a lot of you, even those of you who are very devout Christians. It's probably a problem. And so there needs to be a solution to that problem.
03:15:21 Arch Stanton.
03:15:23 Good gorilla. Good, good grill.
03:15:29 Very interesting stuff tonight. I used to judge Muslim countries as being backward, but maybe all the burkas and the sex segregation was necessary because they are are naturally rapey people, which doesn't make for a sustainable society. No. And that's The thing is that's nothing Beyondism, I think articulates well that.
03:15:50 Yeah, you might have you. You should not have universalist ethics and rules if you don't have universal biology.
03:16:00 If you have a group of people who are biologically more prone to being rapey, you need rules that account for that. And I think look, what look what's happening with the Muslims coming into the West raping people.
03:16:15 And and yet these European countries welcoming them in are also attacking, much like France is, you know, attacking the burka, attacking these, these.
03:16:27 Rules that they they that the Muslims themselves have implemented to police themselves and to try to reduce this this issue they've got.
03:16:37 And and they think that, oh, we're going to just apply Western values to these non Western people and it'll be fine and it's not fine. They end up getting lots of rape.
03:16:45 And so yeah, I that's I think I appreciate it about Beyondism is that.
03:16:51 It made a.
03:16:54 A rational.
03:16:59 I guess expressed rationally the the necessity for different people to have different ethics, and I believe that 100%.
03:17:10 White trash enthusiast.
03:17:26 Thanks for all the great work Sir Stack. If I may recommend 2 short stories to read for all white slave, the true story of Richard Hazelton.
03:17:36 And also a crow killer about Jeremiah liver. Eaton Johnson.
03:17:41 Alright, I'll copy that into my I haven't heard of either one of those stories.
03:17:49 I will look into those.
03:17:53 Thank you, white trash enthusiast.
03:17:56 We got Bessemer.
03:17:59 Cash flow checkout.
03:18:06 I'd like to return this duck.
03:18:08 Bessemer Hi Devon reminds mine. I think you mean reminds me of when the Catholics went to convert Haiti. The folks like Christianity but insisted they also keep their voodoo beliefs. The Catholics said sure no problem. You can have both. Thanks for the deep thoughts. Tonight I'm going to have a listen again to understand this better.
03:18:29 Yeah, that's The thing is, is you can't.
03:18:33 You can't have your cake and eat it too. You know you can't say that we're all God's children, and we all have the same rules and everything should apply to us equally.
03:18:46 But also we're different, you know, like if you're going to be universalist in your.
03:18:52 Theology and in your ethics.
03:18:54 Then you believe in multiracialism because why wouldn't you?
03:18:58 Why wouldn't you?
03:19:00 So that's something else that I think Beyondism. Had it made a good argument for?
03:19:06 Is that, you know having this?
03:19:10 This just acceptance.
03:19:13 That different groups that acceptance of moral relativism not in the way that progressives mean it. Where like it's individualists, individualist based, where it's like, oh, everyone, your morality is just based on your own individual, you know, but whatever you decide that day that it's.
03:19:33 It's it's that's that's too extreme. Like, that's ridiculous and and.
03:19:38 Untenable, but that you should recognize that there are enough differences between groups where ethics would potentially need to be different or apply differently to different groups. And well, you know, one example would be, say, because of the behavior of black children, corporal punishment.
03:19:58 Might be more.
03:20:03 Moral.
03:20:05 When, when raising black children, then raising white children.
03:20:09 Uh. Let's see here.
03:20:14 Rock paladin.
03:20:23 Rock Paladin says hi Devon. I don't have a lot to say, just want to support the show. Can I get a?
03:20:31 Yes you can. Thanks to the support there. Rock Paladin Wired says thanks Devon. When I get another job, I'll throw in some more money way and then every, every, every dollar counts. I appreciate that wire and good luck on the job hunt and I don't say that for selfish reasons.
03:20:50 Hopefully, hopefully. Hopefully you get a job or you get paid millions of dollars.
03:20:54 Brody says hi, Devon, could we please see a pic of your redneck incinerator when you are done with Carla's place? You could put some copper tubing in it and use it as a hot water heater for a hot tub. I guess I could take a picture. It's all. It's just a 50 gallon drum with.
03:21:16 Some holes drilled in the bottom of it and then raised up on center blocks and then a chimney on the top it's. I mean, it's nothing fancy, it's just.
03:21:30 But yeah, I haven't burning in it in a while, but I'll probably warming it back up pretty soon here.
03:21:37 A sharpshooter says hey, Devon good stream. As always, white people burning to lead for other races to succeed, we have to keep racial hygiene and keep our blood free from foreign taint and use eugenics to better our race. Yeah, I guess I I I I I'm a firm believer in eugenics and I think.
03:21:56 That I'm I'm more of a believer in soft eugenics, meaning that you still let the natural part of natural selection take part. Like you don't necessarily have to guide who's breeding with who in some kind of formal way. I don't think that's even necessarily would even produce.
03:22:15 Results you'd want. I think that it would be far better to definitely get rid of the criminal elements of your society by by sterilizing as we were prior to World War 2. The criminal elements of your society being way more liberal with the death penalty.
03:22:36 And then alleviating the financial burdens put on the performers of your society that are used to subsidize the the, the, the non performing members of your society, and that if you just simply did that, that natural selection would kick in because you you would you would give.
03:22:56 The performance of in your society, the natural rewards of their performance. You know, instead of forcing them to subsidize everybody else.
03:23:07 And so you wouldn't have to have to the degree that I think.
03:23:12 Someone like Patel would want he would. He would probably want some kind of formal board of elites, you know, formally trying to identify good traits and different stocks of people and and trying to guide the breeding.
03:23:32 Of those people, I don't think that that would be necessary or even like. As I said, I don't even think it would be desirable. I don't know that it would produce what you would want. You'd probably end up with some.
03:23:41 Unintended consequences. Whereas if you just let nature take its course and then got rid of the the bad, you know the dead weight.
03:23:51 Because right now we're we we practice dysgenics we have a dysgenic society, we punish success and we reward failure. And so if all you did is reverse that, the rest of it would take care of itself.
03:24:04 And then sharpshooter says, speaking about the death penalty car thief should also get the death penalty. Horse thieves in the West would get executed in cars of the modern horse white collar crime death penalty. I believe that 100% if you were to death penalty like bankers, that that commit fraud.
03:24:24 Politicians who commit, you know, I guess, political fraud.
03:24:32 Yeah, I I think you could. I think you could.
03:24:34 Really expand on the death penalty. Let me just put.
03:24:36 It that way, then we got Edward alarmed with the big donut.
03:24:41 Hole money is pie. Money is the only weapon that that you have to defend himself with.
03:24:47 Look how Jewy this fag is.
03:24:54 Hey.
03:25:05 All right. And what alarm says replay gang here? Thank you for your streams. Well, I appreciate that and thanks for the support there. N word alarm man of low moral fiber says 10 violent New Orleans prisoners escaped from prison. Black Guards didn't notice until.
03:25:24 Morning headcount. The press conference was appalling. It illustrates blacking compatibility with modern society. We'll see that. That's another thing you'd be able to separate blacks and let them let them.
03:25:35 Evolve on their own.
03:25:38 And fail on their own.
03:25:41 Because not only should you not prop up the the.
03:25:46 Weaker members of your genetic pool? You certainly shouldn't be propping up any members of other gene pools.
03:25:55 And that would that would alleviate so many issues just that just that just if if you stopped taking resources from whites and giving them to non whites.
03:26:04 I mean, there's there's like half your problems right there.
03:26:08 Reese, Nieder says agree with the arch. Stanton Islam is necessary to control dumb sand people that are super rapy Christianity, or Jungian, archetypal psycho. Spiritual ideology suits higher minded whites that don't need brutal dictatorial rule by punishment. Yeah, different.
03:26:29 Different groups need different amounts of.
03:26:34 Violence really, to get to get a a a cohesive society.
03:26:42 Alright, let's take a look over at Rumble.
03:26:45 And on rumble, I'm going to have to.
03:26:50 Double check something real quick.
03:26:52 So I didn't turn on the.
03:26:56 The.
03:26:59 The whatchamacallit.
03:27:03 Let's see here.
03:27:19 Actually, hang on one second.
03:27:47 Thank you.
03:28:02 Very nearly.
03:28:43 Thank you.
03:29:00 Menu.
03:29:21 Thank you.
03:29:36 Thank you.
03:29:41 Baby.
03:30:00 Radio.
03:30:10 All right, next to that, most almost took longer than than nothing, and I had. There was some commotion outside. I had to.
03:30:22 I do investigate, think it's Javelinas again.
03:30:28 Where was there we go?
03:30:30 I want to make sure this.
03:30:31 Is the.
03:30:35 Here we go.
03:30:38 Over on Rumble Zanzi Mataz, but keep doing what you what you do. You do it. Well, I appreciate that.
03:30:46 Corsica S says what's the worst and word you can call a black person's neighbor.
03:30:53 We need a new religion, something about how whites are going to go extinct in the last 100 years if we don't change how we do things.
03:31:02 Well, I you never know. It might give birth to something, some kind of religious movement. Once the once the pressure is really felt right now unfortunately. Well, I mean, not unfortunately I guess but.
03:31:15 The.
03:31:17 I mean, we are shrinking, but we're not, we're not. So it's we're not such a minority to where there there's like.
03:31:27 What's the word? I can't say unfortunately. That means like, if I sound fortunate, I mean, it sounds like I want there to be less white people.
03:31:33 Bias, regardless of the fortunate fortune of it, there there, there's still enough white people to wear. There's a lot of white people don't realize.
03:31:41 How few white people are?
03:31:42 If that makes any sense and look Europe's not.
03:31:45 As bad as Americans, we.
03:31:46 Have it. We have a different situation here.
03:31:50 Genex, Terminator says bring back miscegenation laws. We need an amusement park like Auschwitz to remember.
03:31:57 The catappa or.
03:32:00 Coward Pata. But I don't know. I thought it was quite tapa, wasn't it, mutapa?
03:32:06 You have kawa Pata.
03:32:09 But yes.
03:32:12 Let's see here.
03:32:14 And we got Cage cage mushan. Juro says replay gang here. Follow you on Twitter, Sir. Always great to hear your opinions. Stay cool. Walk in the shade. We'll catch you. Catch you next time. We'll appreciate that.
03:32:32 Vilified says donation for your next churros cat food. Oh, oh, next churros. OK, well, I appreciate them.
03:32:41 There's a mountain of old churro cat food you think I used to eat so much? I.
03:32:44 Didn't realize how much was.
03:32:46 Was left.
03:32:48 Ah, but appreciate that I was saying we got land of the fake home of the game, the Tower of Babel is a cautionary tale about globalism wanting too much A1 size fits all solution. There is no magic bullet. Anything sold as a panacea should be regarded as us.
03:33:07 Like AI? Yeah, I understand that. I know Christians will will mention that that the Tower of Babel is a cautionary tale that warns against globalism. But the other the here's first of all, here's the issue. Not everyone interprets it.
03:33:21 Like that, the fact that just Christianity in general is interpreted in so many different ways, regardless of what your interpretation is, makes it that all that in and of itself is kind of an issue, that it's not as straightforward as as as one would like it to be and that.
03:33:42 Even if that, that's a story about globalism, which that is your interpretation.
03:33:48 Then it's there's no explicit warning against that, and there's also not a it that still doesn't change the fact that it it is universalist and it's application of ethics when I think that is that is something that is.
03:34:10 Fundamental to the issue.
03:34:13 Ah, let's see here. Scrolling down we got.
03:34:17 Yo Jimbo, Rockford says. Here's some shekels for your courage and asking the important questions like are you hungry, girl? And is your mother a keep up the great work.
03:34:32 Not sure what you mean there exactly.
03:34:35 But.
03:34:38 But yeah.
03:34:41 I was looking for the I think one of them I get and I can't find it. See, I gotta I gotta.
03:34:46 One of these days I'll have all this worked out.
03:34:50 Occidental Front says ever looked into doing a stream on Port Arthur. That YouTube channel the WASP files is pretty good resource. You never expect a false flag can happen to you.
03:35:03 No, I'm not sure what exactly you're talking about, but I will.
03:35:08 I'll copy that and put that in my in my notes and maybe check.
03:35:11 It out later.
03:35:14 Let's see here we've got.
03:35:19 We'll scroll. There we go.
03:35:21 Cage, moose and juro. Again, Mormons all want to be like the Nephites. And by the way, or wait and not, by the way, and bow down under the sword, no matter what race wields it like a death cult. Not 100% sure I get the context. I haven't been to church in many, many years.
03:35:43 So.
03:35:43 Maybe that's why.
03:35:46 An cage which motion Juro says. Actually, I'm talking about the Lamanites, who became me. Fights. They just knelt down and had their heads chopped off. Should idea? Yeah. Again, I'd I'd spend so I'd, you know, I mean, I've read through most of the Book of Mormon, but.
03:36:04 Decades ago, you know, it's.
03:36:07 Unless you're talking about the very basics, it's.
03:36:11 The specifics are all gone.
03:36:14 Cage Mission Joro again says it it's at least important to recognize that the Internet is relatively new technology, and everyone who grew up with with, I think, grew up without it.
03:36:28 Has not managed it extremely well and we are seeing the results well. I would say that.
03:36:33 The people who.
03:36:34 Have grown up with it. Have not managed it extremely well either and and I just think that it's such a new paradigm shifting technology that it will be a long time before people, there's there's a real.
03:36:48 Umm.
03:36:52 Cohesive coexistence between humans and the Internet, you know, like right now, I still feel like it's very disruptive and people aren't sure exactly how to handle it.
03:37:02 Ah, let's see here. Then we've got a cage motion. Jaro again. I have a real problem with people assuming meetings, meetings for. Do you mean meetings for terms that they have not researched just because the word eugenics sounds like the word Gen.
03:37:20 Side does not mean that they mean the same thing. Yeah, a lot of people just they equate the two and maybe that was the reason why the Jewish guy who came up with the word genocide decided to use it.
03:37:31 That you realized it wasn't genocide was not a word. People don't know this little fun fact. Genocide was not a word in the English language until post World War 2.
03:37:44 And the Nuremberg trials. A Jew came up with the word genocide so they could charge the Nazis with their new word. Look it up. I'm not making it up.
03:37:56 Cage, Mush, and Jaro again. Argument for murderers is that people are not raised the same. If you were somehow able to make it that make it that every person was raised correctly. I can understand not or understand why that's not even if you're raised wrong. I don't care if you murder. I don't. We don't need you.
03:38:16 There's I. I don't. I don't. I don't. I don't care what the environment was. If you end up a murderer.
03:38:22 If any environment made you a murderer.
03:38:25 You are. You have the death penalty. That's my. That's my way I look at.
03:38:29 It.
03:38:30 If any environment made you a murderer and look that murderer, by the way, doesn't mean self-defense. I mean like murder.
03:38:37 Like murder, if you're a murderer.
03:38:40 Under any circumstances, you get the death penalty.
03:38:44 Zillow 69420 says if you haven't looked into the Jerry Parks murder, I think it would be an interesting one related to the Vince Foster case and cocaine trafficking in Arkansas. He was a security guy for Clinton. The Jerry Parks murder, I'll.
03:39:03 Is this one of the Clinton body count ones?
03:39:08 I'll put it there.
03:39:12 Let's see here, hate Commander says some good food for thought tonight. Devon, even for a mental defect like me.
03:39:20 I don't know if you're mentally fact, but yeah, I that's. I just wanted to cover it cause I thought it was. It was a fascinating ideology that again, I'm not promoting. I'm just saying this has some interesting, you know, unique ways of looking at things.
03:39:39 Scroll, scroll scroll Negro Spritzer of course expresses his displeasure.
03:39:44 With well negroes and.
03:39:48 Those wearers of small hats.
03:39:52 Enjoyers of tortillas.
03:39:58 Sand frolickers.
03:40:01 Hotel owners.
03:40:05 Buttfuckers, et cetera. How about that?
03:40:10 Scroll scroll, scroll, then we've got Cage, Mission Jaro again says AI doesn't worry me because the electricity will be turned off due to due to the economy soon. Anyway. Well I don't think so. I think. I think we're going to be.
03:40:24 I think electricity will be will be fine and I think they're going to they'll they'll they'll make it more efficient anyway. They're going to make the technology work more efficiently. I think that was one of the big deals with deep sea is.
03:40:36 It it.
03:40:38 Just just already in the short time that we've had some competition, another example, by the way of wind.
03:40:44 Competition increases innovation. Deep sea, one of the I guess the big selling points of DeepSeek was that it lowered the requirement for all these CUDA cores that a lot of this other stuff runs on.
03:40:59 Not that I'm a big expert on.
03:41:01 But I do. I do think it'll get way more efficient than I, and I think you know, there's so much momentum around the American Empire, even if we're in a death spiral, we still have a long ways to go before we hit the ground.
03:41:15 Athos Crow says. I always thought that I was born into a Native American family until dad told me I was born 8 months after his vasectomy. He left his house, car, and bank account to me and now I am a White bastard.
03:41:34 What I don't think I understand what you're saying here. I always thought that I was born into a Native American family until dad told me I was born 8 months after his. Well, I mean.
03:41:45 Takes nine months, so you you could still be you. He left his. He left his house. Car and bank account to me. And now I am a White bastard.
03:41:55 I'm not sure I get what you're saying there, but it sounds.
03:41:59 Sounds sounds interesting. If not, maybe a little confusing. All right, we're gonna go back to entropy. There. We got Reese, Nieder says agree with Arch Stanton. Islam is necessary to control dumb sand people that were always rapey, super rapey Christianity or Jungian archetype. Psychospiritual ideology suits. Oh, wait.
03:42:18 Did I already read that one?
03:42:20 I think I read.
03:42:21 1.
03:42:23 And then Arch Stanton says, my position on death penalty is 4 in theory against it in practice. In other words, if it's going to take 50 years to execute someone, what's the point? No, I think it should be immediate.
03:42:38 I think it should be immediate. I think that and it would be the court system would be way less burdened if we were way more into eugenics.
03:42:51 You know, like how that's The thing is our, our, our whole justice system that this is another thing our whole justice system was designed to accommodate white people.
03:43:00 Is that who it's accommodating? Is that who the justice system is is wrapped up and preoccupied with no. And so if we were in a society that only had to deal with other white people, then your justice system would be a lot more able to handle the caseload.
03:43:19 And and also by the way, so would your.
03:43:23 Your law enforcement system.
03:43:26 Then we got Antonio Vay.
03:43:36 Why is that not playing?
03:43:37 Audio.
03:43:40 Hang on a SEC.
03:43:46 Hello. Hello. Hello, hello.
03:43:46 Now I'm playing. That's weird.
03:43:50 Alright, that's weird, Antonio Vey says. Testing, testing Fagot fagot well. There you go, Antonio Bay. Everything seems to everything appears to be working just fine.
03:44:01 I think it seems to be working just fine. All right guys. Well.
03:44:10 Let's double check rumble real quick. OK, wait, we got one last one. Our rumble guitar. Dude, 1360 says the Jews took over America by turning the country into a mouse utopia experiment.
03:44:23 And.
03:44:25 What is the main or min donation for the short vids and what is the min for you to ship?
03:44:32 Honeys, you mean?
03:44:34 I arbitrarily pick $25 to hit, hit a an animation. I don't know why it land on that.
03:44:43 The secrets out now. I guess the and then the ship honey out. That's going to be like I said, I got to figure out the.
03:44:51 The packaging and the distribution side of things, which I'll be I will be exploring this year.
03:44:59 And at the earliest, it'll be available later this year, before Christmas and.
03:45:05 Or I'll at least have explored it the options enough to have it available by by the following year. I don't know that I have enough. I'll have enough honey to to sell a whole lot of it.
03:45:16 But next year is probably more likely this year. Who knows? You know, I have the equipment now to package it and I have designed the packaging, which I've been. I designed it a couple of years ago. I've been itching to fucking show you guys this shit. That's so fucking hilarious.
03:45:35 And I'm not just hitting my own horn, it's it is really funny. You guys will like it.
03:45:41 But that said, I have to have money to put into the packaging and I got to figure out the the shipping and the distribution side of things. I've never done anything like this before in my life.
03:45:52 But we'll get it figured out. Alright, guys, I'm gonna go ahead and shut it down now. I appreciate you guys being here and supporting the show and hopefully, like I said, hopefully no one. No one got their panties in a bunch tonight. I it was not my intention to to do anything other than to provoke.
03:46:12 Some some thinking and some discussion about.
03:46:18 Possible future theological options for for White people and ethnocentric philosophy options, or at least ideas. Alright guys. In the meantime, hope you all have a good rest of your weekend. We'll be back here on Wednesday night.
03:46:37 In in the mean time.
03:46:41 Bedump bedump.
03:46:44 I am of course.
03:46:46 Devon Stack.
03:46:53 Right.
03:46:55 She's about to crush.
03:46:58 Ohh shit.
03:46:59 Oh.
03:47:09 Ohh.
03:47:18 Thank you.
03:47:19 No.
03:47:23 What?
03:47:28 That.